Sam S. White

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Salesianum. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Your edit summary said "clean". That wasn't a clean, it was wholesale deletion of properly cited content. Biker Biker (talk) 08:59, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sam S. White for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Salesianum, you will be blocked from editing. Removing uncited information is part of keeping Wikipedia clean, but you also removed large sections of cited text. The way you did it was vandalism pure and simple. Go ahead and delete the stuff which has had a citation tag for a while but leave the other stuff unless you can show that the citation is clearly wrong. Biker Biker (talk) 22:13, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

I removed uncited fluff, and you know it. If it's genuine, add citations, but don't you dare call me a vandal just because you're too lazy to do some work or too dishonest to admit it can't be done. Sam S. White (talk) 23:08, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

⇌ Jake Wartenberg 05:20, 22 December 2009 (UTC)