Speedy deletion nomination of NineStar Connect edit

Hello Sam Klemet,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged NineStar Connect for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Reb1981 (talk) 01:06, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply
 

Regarding Speedy Deletion
Hello, Sam Klemet. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia.
I'm sorry, but this has been deleted as meeting one or more of the Categories for Speedy Deletion.
Generally, articles are speedily deleted when there is no assertion of significance or they fall into things to avoid or what Wikipedia is not.
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject.
Sometimes articles are deleted because they contain content copyrighted elsewhere. Such content can be used as a source of information, but the content here must be completely rewritten from scratch.
Some articles contain material written in a promotional tone. These must often be written from scratch. They are vigorously deleted.
Any content that is negative in tone and unsourced or which is disparaging will also be vigorously deleted.
Any deficiencies with notability, sourcing, or things to avoid should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions.
For test edits, click Sam Klemet/sandbox
If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard to guide you through the creation process.
You may find this tool useful: Google custom search


If you have verifiable information from reliable sources that show subject does meet notability requirements Let me know.
CONTENT IN ARTICLES NEEDS TO BE RELIABLY SOURCED.

Dlohcierekim 02:04, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for being so honest. In the article talk page you admit to creating the page to the subject's spec. THIS IS EXACTLY Y THIS PAGE MUST BE DELETED! It's wholly promotional in nature. Excuse me. Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion. You say you hand-crafted it, yet we got a copvio report from another page, one which was clearly promotional in nature. I invite you to read the relevant policy, Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. I further invite you to read about how Wikipedia is not for promotional purposes, paid or otherwise-- Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_a_soapbox_or_means_of_promotion. If you are here purely to fulfil the wishes of an outside entity, you may be editing with a conflict of interest. Further info on this subject is available at WP:COI. Thank you. Dlohcierekim 19:10, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of NineStar Connect edit

Hello Sam Klemet,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged NineStar Connect for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

TimothyJosephWood 13:14, 8 June 2017 (UTC)Reply