Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 2) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 07:45, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Salwazain, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 07:45, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

The Concept of Rahmani30 edit

Rahmani30 started with the vision to search, find, house and train the most trainable students without any stated or implied fees. The process involves the following:

Student enrollment process: Screening of candidates by standardized objective written test followed by behavioral interview for final selection. Student housing: Students are provided with complete supervised hostel accommodation; emphasizing a clean environment and appropriate nutritious meals. Student training: Specialized and highly skilled topic oriented teachers are sought and hired to lecture and demonstrate on the topic of their specialization. Student progress measurement: A collaborative process between students, administration, and lecturer to keep students from lagging behind with regular, topic oriented, progress reports. Lecturer progress measurement: A collaborative process between students, administration, and lecturers to provide the most conducive learning environment, eliminating communication issues, cultural misunderstandings and addressing grievances. Student outward enrollment process: The process to help students apply for various standardized examinations.

Our Results edit

A 100% successful result at IIT Joint Entrance Examination by its students introduced Rahmani30 to the people of India and the world at large, better than any marketing campaign. The successful outcome of Rahmani30 has demonstrated the potential of the idea and now it requires adoption and implementation at a mass scale by our societies. The following are key conclusions from this experiment:

Disadvantaged students, though brought up in very poor education systems, adapt and perform to the highest level. Institutions such as Rahmani30 can provide disadvantaged students a fighting chance in this competitive world. The idea of Rahmani30 needs to be adopted for creating education awareness in the society and to provide for change from within the societ

References edit

External links edit

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammad Wali Rahmani (March 9) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Quasar G. was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Quasar G t - c 16:23, 9 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohammad Wali Rahmani (June 29) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. DrStrauss talk 07:43, 29 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rahmani 30 (July 1) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
» Shadowowl | talk 10:34, 1 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mohammad Wali Rahmani edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mohammad Wali Rahmani requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from rahmanimission.info/president.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. J947( c ) (m) 19:38, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Rahmani30 edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rahmani30 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Comatmebro (talk) 04:46, 29 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Rahmani 30 concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rahmani 30, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Rahmani 30 edit

 

Hello, Salwazain. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rahmani 30".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:00, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Hazrat Maulana Wali Rahmani for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hazrat Maulana Wali Rahmani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hazrat Maulana Wali Rahmani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 13:43, 7 March 2018 (UTC)Reply