SalmonCat

Welcome!

Hello, SalmonCat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. OccultZone (Talk) 03:56, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

SalmonCat, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi SalmonCat! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:08, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Robbie Daymond

The article Robbie Daymond has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 16:14, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

It's OK, you can delete it. SalmonCat (talk) 16:17, 22 May 2014 (UTC) P.S. Does your username come from "Robot Pirate Ninja President" from Fanboy and Chum Chum? I love that show! SalmonCat (talk) 16:17, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

???

Okay, who edited my Browne Boyz page? Kate? SalmonCat (talk) 21:04, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Nickelodeon cross-overs may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• from ''[[Drake And Josh]]'' appeared on an episode of ''[[Victorious]]'' when Helen Dubois [the movie premiere manager from ''[[Drake and Josh]]'' appeared on Helen Back Again

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:46, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Did not notice that. I will fix it. SalmonCat (talk) 22:47, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Hi, just a heads-up, though your attempts to lighten up Wikipedia through humor are appreciated, edit summaries are intended to be used to summarize the edits you are making to an article, not for random commentary, as I've noticed you've done here, here, and here for example. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:41, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: It will be better if you link to the appropriate rule. OccultZone (Talk) 02:55, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

WP:EDITSUMMARY should adequately explain the community's expectations on the subject. @OccultZone:, if you have a more specific rule in mind, please let us know. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:17, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: No offense to you, you did a tremendous job by notifying the user about the summaries. Page is on my watchlist as I had created this page, I wanted to welcome the user. I was just telling you to let user know about the page from where they can read more. OccultZone (Talk) 04:24, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Encyclopedic language

Hi SalmonCat, I think generally you're doing a decent job, but I have two more minor notes for you. TV synopses (and pretty much everything else here) need to be written in proper encyclopedic tone. We need to make sure the language is clear and professional, describes the episode, and doesn't contain flowery statements or promotional affectations. Sometimes when we read episode summaries on the official site, we'll see a different style of cutesy language that is intended to get people to watch their show, like:

"After finding a spell to reverse time, our two wackadoodle heroes use the spell for every problem under the sun! Will the two learn to stop abusing temporal anomalies?"

This isn't how we'd present the information at Wikipedia, because it's inappropriate to use exclamations and rhetorical questions, and we need to present the subject with real-world context (i.e. without using "in-universe" language and concepts.) A better version of this sentence might be:

"Tim and Mike find a spell to reverse time, but overuse the spell on every minor problem they encounter. After their carelessness winds up destroying the city, the duo fixes the mess they've made, and ultimately learn how to use time spells responsibly."

The other note is that when we write about prose, we use persistent present-tense, which means that as a summary evolves, we're learning about what's happening right now. "The team goes here, but then this happens, so they do this, and that results in this." In your edit here, I changed "and Penny gladly made them!" to "and Penny gladly makes them", which is closer to persistent present-tense. There's a lot of stuff to remember, I know. Though it's a big document, you might benefit from reading Writing Better Articles, and if you're going to write about television articles, you might also consider taking a look at the Manual of Style for Television. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Good luck! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:02, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

A brownie for you!

Here's a brownie to welcome you to Wikipedia. Albeit a little rough around the edges, I appreciate your enthusiasm. Vjmlhds (talk) 02:29, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Brownies are so delicious! I eat them in real life all the time! Thanks a whole lot! --SalmonCat (talk) 23:59, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

I'm so sorry!

I'm really sorry!!! I didn't mean to totally copy the format of your user page. You'll still be my best bap forever! -User: RamBamBoo

Userspace

Please don't use Wikipedia to store your fiction, even if it's just in your userspace. Thank you. DS (talk) 03:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Oh. I spent soooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much time on that Browne Boyz page! Now all the info on it is GONE!! :( SalmonCat (talk) 10:51, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

If you add your e-mail address to your preferences, I can arrange to have the content sent to you, if you really want. You could also download a free copy of our MediaWiki software, to run on your own computer. DS (talk) 12:01, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Don't Worry!

SalmonCat?! It's totally okay! You can always edit my Wiki. This si just how the Internet is! From, User:RamBamBoo — Preceding undated comment added 12:31, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for editing Fanboys and Good Girls Wiki, Jenna!!! I left you a comment! — Preceding unsigned comment added by RamBamBoo (talk • contribs) 16:15, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

And what does this have to do with Wikipedia?! SalmonCat (talk) 00:24, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

The Shapies

Hi, thanks for your attempt to sort out The Shapies, I've left a note requesting sourcing.Talk:The_Shapies#Possible_vandalism MartinSFSA (talk) 17:35, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Writers and Storyboarders

Should we add Written By and Storyboards By on the Sheriff Callie's Wild West page in the Episodes section? I see Written By and Storyboards By in the End Credits of episodes. So should we add them to the Sheriff Callie's Wild West page? - EvilLair (talk) 01:58, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Totally! If it's in the credits, then why not?! SalmonCat (talk) 00:00, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Q2

Hi Salmon, to quickly answer your question from this edit summary, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4 represent divisions of the year into quarters. Q1=Jan–Mar, Q2=Apr–Jun, etc. Since we do not use seasons, quarters are sometimes used as alternatives. Aside from that I think removing the unsourced content was a good idea. Regards. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:47, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Clan (TV channel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Next Step. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Help with cleaning up Jelly Jamm

In lieu of the persistent disruptive/non-sensical IP edits, the aricle is now semi-protected temporarily. This gives time and oppurtunity to mostly clean up the article without disruption. All that needs to be done is rewriting section-by-section into at least readable english, and if possible introduce more citations, so no knowledge of the show really needs to apply. Once it's in decent state, if any vandalism of the article continues it will be much more manageable and notable. I've seen you involved in preventing the vandalising of the article, I hope your interested in improving it. Thank you. Derick1259 (talk) 12:07, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, SalmonCat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, SalmonCat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Edit on userpage

Just fixed up a wiki-link. Hope you won't mind. (are you jenn-alt from deviantart? i LOVE your art!) --Globox! (talk) 03:09, 2 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SalmonCat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)