Your submission at Articles for creation: Sakthi Saravanan Stunt Master (December 6) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HighKing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
HighKing++ 22:13, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Sakgroups! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HighKing++ 22:13, 6 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Sakthi Saravanan Stunt Master edit

 

Hello, Sakgroups. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sakthi Saravanan Stunt Master".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 02:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of interest edit

  Hello, Sakgroups. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Athaenara 05:28, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Blocked edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Athaenara 05:28, 8 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sakgroups (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

There is absolutely no intention of promotion or advertising by creating this page. The page was created to list the achievement of stunt master working in Indian Film Industry. He himself is unable to do it and so we helped him out of friendship. We dropped the page as is becos we couldnt more information from him after that. There is no intention of promotion or advertisments in this. please unblock me. Thanks Sakgroups (talk) 14:37, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Listing this man's achievements is considered promotional here. Wikipedia is interested in what independent reliable sources state about article subjects. As a stunt person I assume that they worked for you at some point, this is a conflict of interest(please review). You'll need to describe other subjects unrelated to your field that you might edit about besides any conflict of interest related edits you might make. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 16:17, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Who is "we"? 331dot (talk) 14:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sakgroups (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

We meaning "I". I worked with him in one movie Sakgroups (talk) 15:07, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Procedural, duplicate request, likely created in error. RickinBaltimore (talk) 15:09, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You said "we helped him". That's not an "I". Please make subsequent comments as standard, unformatted comments like this one, as you only need one open request. 331dot (talk) 15:13, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

What is my next step. How to get unblocked Sakgroups (talk) 15:33, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Your next step is to answer my question and follow the instructions I have given. You only need one open request, do not make additional requests. Subsequent comments should just be written and posted, as I am doing. 331dot (talk) 15:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
Yes. I believe I have answered your question already. Let me know if you need any further clarifications. Also I understand there has to be only one request. Do I need to delete it now and if so how? Sakgroups (talk) 15:43, 3 March 2020 (UTC).Reply
You say you understand, but you keep making more requests. Just leave the one you have- additional comments should not have the unblock request formatting. You have not answered my question- you said "we helped him", not "I helped him". Who is "we"? I also note that your username contains "groups". If you work for an agency or any organization, please say so now. 331dot (talk) 15:48, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

sakgroups is my email id. And so the user name. groups doesn't mean anything. I am a movie director of upcoming feature film in Tamil language. I am not working for any organization. So again the word "we" is just me. By mistake I used the word "we" instead of "I"

I have declined your request above; you can now make another, if you do, it will be reviewed by someone else for fairness to you. 331dot (talk) 16:17, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Thanks and I understand you are helping me but I am really confused. How do I make another request?

You do it just as you did the first one, place it at the bottom of this page. 331dot (talk) 16:21, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sakgroups (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to have my block removed. I am an individual user who wanted to create a page for my friend. I do not belong to any organization. I am also not paid by anyone to create a page. I was just helping my friend. My user name "sakgroups" is just my email id. groups doesn't mean anything. Thanks and let me know if you have any further questions Sakgroups (talk) 16:25, 3 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:40, 27 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Can someone review and unblock me. This is a valid request. I need it to create a page for me. The one I created was for my friend and we are not commercial. Please help Thanks

  • What did you mean by "We have submitted many films under Filmography"? What did you submit, how, and where? JBW (talk) 23:51, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply