SaintIX
Joined 18 September 2022
Latest comment: 4 months ago by SaintIX in topic Welcome!
Welcome! edit
Hi SaintIX! I noticed your contributions to Material (band) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! ~~mAyLiNgOeEd (Talk to me!) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜) 02:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Maylingoed Thank you, that's very kind of you. I only corrected a tiny typo: the article mentioned a recording at WTTW Stusios, Chicago and I've assumed that that should have read Studios. As s & d are adjacent on a QWERTY keyboard I thought it was a pretty safe assumption. SaintIX (talk) 03:12, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- @SaintIX, It's the little things that count! You've done an amazing job at correcting typos so far, looking at your contributions. ~~mAyLiNgOeEd (Talk to me!) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜) 03:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Maylingoed Thank you, it's very kind of you to say so and it's nice to be appreciated. I think Wikipedia is an amazing resource and worth having the internet for if nothing else. My finances are pretty awful ATM (I'm currently unemployed, surviving on very little), but I make a point of donating to Wikipedia every year. It's not much and I wish I could afford more, but it's better than nothing and if everyone who uses Wikipedia did so there wouldn't be a problem. How quickly we become accustomed to having it all at our fingertips, taking it for granted. Franky, I'm a little shocked at how few people do donate. I'm also curious where the whole inaccuracy rumour originated because I suspect that there's an ulterior motive behind it. Someone doesn't like knowledge being universally available and is seeking to discredit Wikipedia. I know, it sounds like a conspiracy theory, but that's why I'm curious about its origin. On the whole I think pretty much all conspiracy theories are just fantasy, but how about this for a meta conspiracy theory: someone is putting out all these ridiculous conspiracy theories so that the people who don't fall for them dismiss all of them, thus discrediting the ones that are actually true. It becomes not just a rabbit-hole but a warren of them. Having said all that, I'm still a bit suspicious about the Wikipedia thing. For one thing it's so incredibly unfair to all the editors who do a sterling job out of the goodness of their hearts and a belief that knowledge should be available to anyone. I'm more than happy to make my modest contribution. Take care SaintIX (talk) 05:00, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- I'm glad that you have started to edit Wikipedia! All constructive contributions are good contributions, I hope to see you around!
- PS: If you are interested in editing a topic, consider joining a Wikiproject, they provide resources and information about editing various articles, and also connect you with people that have similar interests. ~~mAyLiNgOeEd (Talk to me!) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜) 05:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Maylingoed Thanks, I'll look into that, and the list of things that need doing. I think I'm good at proof-reading. SaintIX (talk) 05:15, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Maylingoed Thank you, it's very kind of you to say so and it's nice to be appreciated. I think Wikipedia is an amazing resource and worth having the internet for if nothing else. My finances are pretty awful ATM (I'm currently unemployed, surviving on very little), but I make a point of donating to Wikipedia every year. It's not much and I wish I could afford more, but it's better than nothing and if everyone who uses Wikipedia did so there wouldn't be a problem. How quickly we become accustomed to having it all at our fingertips, taking it for granted. Franky, I'm a little shocked at how few people do donate. I'm also curious where the whole inaccuracy rumour originated because I suspect that there's an ulterior motive behind it. Someone doesn't like knowledge being universally available and is seeking to discredit Wikipedia. I know, it sounds like a conspiracy theory, but that's why I'm curious about its origin. On the whole I think pretty much all conspiracy theories are just fantasy, but how about this for a meta conspiracy theory: someone is putting out all these ridiculous conspiracy theories so that the people who don't fall for them dismiss all of them, thus discrediting the ones that are actually true. It becomes not just a rabbit-hole but a warren of them. Having said all that, I'm still a bit suspicious about the Wikipedia thing. For one thing it's so incredibly unfair to all the editors who do a sterling job out of the goodness of their hearts and a belief that knowledge should be available to anyone. I'm more than happy to make my modest contribution. Take care SaintIX (talk) 05:00, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @SaintIX, It's the little things that count! You've done an amazing job at correcting typos so far, looking at your contributions. ~~mAyLiNgOeEd (Talk to me!) (See what else I did on Wikipedia!!📜) 03:14, 22 December 2023 (UTC)