Saini1987

October 2014

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saini1987 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The link i added yesterday is not my site. That link have the similar content like that article where i added that link in references section. You can remove that if you think that's a spam link. Sorry. I didn't understand why you are saying that Wikipedia is a publically editable site as you people usually ban users that edit any article. Sorry if i broken any rules.Saini1987 (talk) 02:41, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because I don't consider it to be entirely adequate.

To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that the block is no longer necessary because you:

1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 04:41, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saini1987 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I logged in yesterday to Wikipedia after one or two years to try to contribute to wikipedia, my intention is not to damage wikipedia but to contribute as an author and provide meaningful articles. I agree that when i signed up 2 years ago, i added some links of my sites to some articles but then realized that i should remove them and got some warnings from other administrators. In anger i haven't done anything and haven't logged in here again. Yesterday, i logged in only to take part in Wikipedia adding useful articles not to destroy the content of Wikipedia. I hope you will unblock me and give one single chance to me.

Thanks Saini1987 (talk) 13:16, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You logged on yesterday after two years and ... first made exactly the sort of edit that you had before, then created an article which seemed to exist solely to drive traffic to a particular website. Before you sit there and feel sorrier for yourself and lash out, you might want to read the page that explains exactly why making this sort of edit repeatedly gets you blocked indefinitely. — Daniel Case (talk) 16:00, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saini1987 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Actually i searched for Moto X 2nd Gen and via google i was sent o that page of Wikipedia, i thought the site link i added to that article is an exact match site about Moto X 2nd gen, so i added it. I am again confirming that the site link i added is not mine, i added that link to the article only because it was matching with that article. I will remove it if you think that i am trying to add my site to that article. I tried to add links to article body when i signed up and this time I added only a matching site link to the reference area of that article. And can you please tell me which article i created to drive traffic? I am again feeling sorry what i did in the beginning when i signed up here. I hope that you will unblock me and give me one chance to prove myself. Thanks Saini1987 (talk) 13:15, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

While we're usually pretty good about giving second chances, it's hard to do so when someone is lying to us. At least use different Google Ad IDs across your spam sites. Kuru (talk) 14:40, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.