Saikat shome

Welcome!

Hello, Saikat shome, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Standard English did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  BilCat (talk) 07:15, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Recent edit to Standard English

Hi! Recently, I've reverted your edit to "Standard English," under the grounds that you were changing the paragraph spacing in a negative manner, in edition to removal of properly formed content. If you have any questions or think I made a mistake, please contact me. Thank you! Sincerely, Redactyll (talk) 04:44, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello friends or mentor,

Please review your edits. I have an undoubtedly opposed your definition on standard English.

Kindly for your information. The subject of standard English is passed by uno under subjected terms of free form creative part. That mean that it not under any statutory bodies or under any government regulations.

Hope you understand.

If you need more proof then contact again. Thanks Saikat shome (talk) 11:03, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

Saikat shome, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Saikat shome! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:09, 5 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Standard English, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 07:14, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Standard English. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. BilCat (talk) 07:15, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Hello friends or mentor,

Please review your edits. I have an undoubtedly opposed your definition on standard English.

Kindly for your information. The subject of standard English is passed by uno under subjected terms of free form creative part. That mean that it not under any statutory bodies or under any government regulations.

Hope you understand.

If you need more proof then contact again. Thanks Saikat shome (talk) 11:05, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Draft:STANDARD ENGLISHES

Draft:STANDARD ENGLISHES, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:STANDARD ENGLISHES and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:STANDARD ENGLISHES during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. CoolSkittle (talk) 11:52, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: STANDARD ENGLISHES (December 7)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 15:08, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

December 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Miscellany for deletion notices from articles in Miscellany for deletion debates, as you did with Draft:STANDARD ENGLISHES. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. CoolSkittle (talk) 01:59, 8 December 2018 (UTC)