Not a deletion its an improvement read before you revert!!!--74.96.4.9 (talk) 06:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

Hello, Saforcer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --A NobodyMy talk 17:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

July 2009

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to User talk:24.150.115.181, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 21:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Copied from User talk:David Levy

edit

Hi, as I'm sure you know, I'm relatively new to Wikipedia, and sometimes (once in a very rare while), my sense of humour gets the best of me, and I impersonate and admin by adding my name to the List of Administrators. Humour aside, I became a Wikipedia user to try and defend against the high level of vandalism that has resulted in most educational institutions ruling out Wikipedia as a viable source of information. I was wondering if there were any suggestions you could give me on how to properly go about policing Wikipedia. How does one detect vandalism, without going about the slow process of scanning the recent changes page? Also, once detected, what is the most efficient method of dealing with vandalism? Your input would be greatly appreciated. Saforcer (talk) 21:06, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Firstly, do not impersonate an administrator ever. I'd assumed that you merely misunderstood what it meant to be an administrator and honestly believed that you were one. If you misrepresent yourself as an administrator again, you're likely to be blocked as a result of the inherent disruption.
I'll leave the counter-vandalism advice to someone more experienced in that area. —David Levy 21:22, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

You don't need "speed" you need to study up and learn what is vandalism, and what is not. Slow down and be careful. Please note you have already been told this, with links to where to study. KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 22:40, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Firstly, I have read up on it. I did my reading a while ago. However, I agree with you, I am often too speedy in my response to what I (sometimes mistakenly) perceive to be vandalism. However, mine is not a flaw in understanding, it is a flaw in detection. I am trying to improve my detection of vandalism. Currently, I am sitting and staring at the recent changes, picking changed articles, almost at random, looking for possible vandalism. You have been a Wikipedian much longer than I have. There has to be a more efficient method. Care to share? Saforcer (talk) 22:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

It is mostly simply taking your time and being careful. There is no benefit if you rush and cause more problems than you resolve. If you want to help, then be careful. KillerChihuahua?!?Advice 22:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit
 

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply