Safe-Keeper
| This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Safe-Keeper. |
I see from an edit summary in this article that you know one of the survivors from the slide. The article would be better if it had images. Do you have some that you want to release under a free license? Rettetast 20:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
- I have thought about asking her, as there don't seem to be any other way to get free-license pictures other than going down there and taking them myself, which I don't want to. I'm not entirely sure about bothering her that way, though - we'll see where it goes. --Safe-Keeper 21:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Citing developer statements is certainly better than nothing (especially if it's text/HTML rather than 'rich media', EG audio/mp3 or video/Flash), although I believe only independent third-party sources fully meet WP:VERIFY and/or WP:CRYSTAL. As for the content, I don't really know. You might want to visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games for ideas, and maybe specifically ask for help/suggestions/collaboration, possibly by posting it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Peer review. You could also post the article at the more general Wikipedia:Peer review for a broader assessment. Seattlenow 01:22, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
I saw from the talk page of Jack Kevorkian's article that you said citing the patients of Dr. Kevorkian was a violation of their right to privacy. Because of this, I wanted to notify you that a user by the IP Address of 68.255.27.55 has added an extensive list of the name of his patients. Please deal with this matter how you see fit. Rsage 05:10, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- To be honest, I don't know if it is, and as such I don't feel that I have the authority to remove it. It should be organized into two coloumns, though. --Safe-Keeper 17:48, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of First Strike (mod) edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article First Strike (mod), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs (talk) 23:34, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)