Articles for deletion nomination of Norwich Marketplace edit

I have nominated Norwich Marketplace, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norwich Marketplace. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:14, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppetry edit

  You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sacsomgerine. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:41, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of The Claremont Pier Fun Palace edit

 

The article The Claremont Pier Fun Palace has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, or even of significance. Not an A7 speedy because A7 doesn't apply to building compelxes, but should not stay unless notability can be at least indicated.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DES (talk) 17:39, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

 

The article The South Pier Family Entertainment Centre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indications of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DES (talk) 17:59, 28 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Indefinitely blocked edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely for sock puppetry. (blocked by –MuZemike 00:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC))Reply
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Speedy deletion nomination of Marina Theatre edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Marina Theatre requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 21:34, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

"London Road North" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect London Road North. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 26#London Road North until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 09:46, 26 June 2021 (UTC)Reply