Sa.Editor121
July 2024
edit
Hello, I'm SShreddies. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tony Banks (businessman) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. SShreddies (talk) 17:00, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
August 2024
edit | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:51, 1 August 2024 (UTC) |
Unblocking Request.
edit
Sa.Editor121 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Wikipedia Administrators,
I understand that my account has been indefinitely blocked under the suspicion of being a sockpuppet created to violate Wikipedia policy. I sincerely apologize for any actions that may have led to this conclusion and for any inconvenience or disruption this may have caused to the Wikipedia community.
I want to clarify that I have not created or used multiple accounts to evade policies or engage in disruptive behavior. My sole intention on Wikipedia has always been to contribute positively and help build a reliable and informative resource for all users.
If any of my edits or actions appeared suspicious or harmful, I deeply regret this and offer my sincere apologies. It was never my intention to violate any guidelines or cause any negative impact. I am committed to understanding and adhering to all Wikipedia policies moving forward.
I kindly request that, if any of my edits have had a negative effect, they be reviewed and deleted if necessary. I fully respect and support the need to maintain the integrity and quality of Wikipedia's content. I am eager to learn from this experience and make amends for any mistakes I may have made.
Please consider my request for unblocking. I genuinely value the opportunity to contribute to Wikipedia and am dedicated to ensuring that all my future actions align with the community's standards and expectations.
Thank you for your time and understanding.
Decline reason:
We do not consider chatbot generated requests. GPTZero score: 100%. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 03:35, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sa.Editor121 (talk) 02:24, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
Administrator note Your unblock request is noted. I am unconvinced by your claims of innocence based on the available evidence. However, I have noted your request at the SPI and endorsed further investigation by an administrator with checkuser rights. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:58, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
- I am very sorry, yes I take some help from AI but did not write fully by ai and I didn't copy-paste it. I have written my own way. please consider me. if you want I will write another letter without Ai touching it and send it. I apologize for my mistake. please forgive me. Sa.Editor121 (talk) 04:11, 2 August 2024 (UTC)
