Your submission at Articles for creation: KHAS EKADAS TILI(TILAK OR TOLA OR BALANCE) CASTE (August 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:17, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Sushabhan.giri! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 10:17, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

August 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Tilli—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:18, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:ALL ABOUT KHAS EKADAS TILI (TILAK) CASTE

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:ALL ABOUT KHAS EKADAS TILI (TILAK) CASTE, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥(ContainThisEmber?) 11:31, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tilli. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Tilli was changed by Sushabhan.giri (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.916974 on 2023-08-14T18:50:09+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:50, 14 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

December 2023

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tilli, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ekdalian (talk) 16:44, 9 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

I provided all details and you don't even know anything about the tilli jati..................first gather information brother....they are classified as elite merchents just like khatris of punjab..........h.h. risley in his book castes and tribes also mentioned about them.....so hh risley is not reliable and verified?................and they are bais rajputs.......it is their in jstor SWAPAN.CHAKROBARTY011112 (talk) 12:28, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Tili Jati, you may be blocked from editing. Melcous (talk) 21:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

i mentioned page number also SWAPAN.CHAKROBARTY011112 (talk) 12:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Tili Jati, you may be blocked from editing. Ekdalian (talk) 14:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history at Tili Jati shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
I have explained each of my edits in edit summaries! Unexplained revert and edit warring will be reported. Ekdalian (talk) 16:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Tili Jati. Ekdalian (talk) 18:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notice of discretionary sanctions on caste articles

edit
 This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Ekdalian (talk) 14:17, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

your edit about tili is not enoughly documented......your writing about tili is based upon some political things.....................And I added a lot information....................what is your problem with complete information............please don't edit the content..............expand your knowledge....I am from a hindu brahmin family........I know better than you........some tili peoples requested me to writw the actual history....so as per you.h.h. risley's book is not a relaible source.............isn't it?...........such a poor knowledge SWAPAN.CHAKROBARTY011112 (talk) 16:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

December 2023

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 20:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
SWAPAN.CHAKROBARTY011112 (talk) 18:33, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
ekdalian was covering only political aspects.so I wrote the full..........and he continuosly was deleting my article and adding redirect to his page about tilli....and look at his latest edit he deleted all....and his source of articles is political stuffs SWAPAN.CHAKROBARTY011112 (talk) 18:35, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
SWAPAN.CHAKROBARTY011112 (talk) 18:37, 20 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SWAPAN.CHAKROBARTY011112 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I added references and more than 30 references but ekdalian was covering only political aspects.so I wrote the full..........and he continuosly was deleting my article and adding redirect to his page about tilli....and look at his latest edit he deleted all....and his source of articles is political stuffs most probably user:Ekdalian is a politically exposed person misleading castes because then the castes like tili,rajput etc will go for caste based fight.and it will help the respective party most probably tmc or left gov will use caste based politics

Decline reason:

Please read WP:GAB to understand how to craft an appropriate unblock request. Yamla (talk) 13:14, 21 December 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion

edit

  Confirmed block evasion as SagnikBhattacharya2023 and Sagnik Mukhopadhyay23122023. --Yamla (talk) 10:39, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:KHAS EKADAS TILI(TILAK OR TOLA OR BALANCE) CASTE

edit

  Hello, SWAPAN.CHAKROBARTY011112. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:KHAS EKADAS TILI(TILAK OR TOLA OR BALANCE) CASTE, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:10, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply