SOBYTHIRUVALLA-PULLAD

File copyright problem with File:PULLAD KUMBANAD ST THOMAS MARTHOMA CHURCH NEAR THIRUVALLA.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:PULLAD KUMBANAD ST THOMAS MARTHOMA CHURCH NEAR THIRUVALLA.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Radiant chains (talk) 01:00, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

What is the point in having pullad-kumbanad when there exists Pullad and Kumbanad articles ? Also, dont copy content from Kumbanad page. That is a copyright violation.

AFD Nomination: Pullad

An article that you have been involved in editing, Pullad, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, you are welcome to add your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pullad (2nd nomination). Thank you. Ncmvocalist (talk) 05:49, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009

Please stop copying text from one article to another as you did on Pullad. It is a violation of our copyright licenses. Also, Wikipedia is not a soapbox so do not enter petitions and other requirements you have of the local government. This type of content is not encyclopaedic and detracts from the value of Wikipedia. Read Your first article to understand how to write an article. -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 06:36, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Pullad. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 13:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding 'burning issues' section in wiki articles. This is not a place to provide feedback or post complaints against a particluar person, institution or geographical location --Josephvg (talk) 19:38, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Pullad, you will be blocked from editing. -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 12:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

You have been warned by different editors many times. If you continue to add petitions and other unrelated content to articles you will be blocked. -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 18:58, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

I've blocked you from editing because I don't think you quite get what Wikipedia is for. Your edits to our encyclopedia are unconstructive, and others are having to clean up after you.

I'm going to leave you a welcome message here. Please please read the links. If you come back after the block and haven't read and heeded the links, the next block you get may well be permanent. For more information on this, see

• Wikipedia's policies on vandalism
• Policies on banned or discouraged content

If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so on Wikipedia:Sandbox rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style
• Policy on neutral point of view
• Guideline on external links
• Guideline on conflict of interest

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Please bear in mind that any admin reviewing this block may or may not unblock or extend this block at their discretion.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); — Kralizec! (talk) 21:56, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

September 2009

Stop adding inappropriate content to articles. You have been warned multiple times and also blocked once. If you continue your disruptive behavior you will be blocked again, for a longer duration. -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 16:13, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

October 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Pullad, you will be blocked from editing. -SpacemanSpiff 14:18, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

Block

You were told a month ago that you don't get what Wikipedia is for. 212.76.84.237 has just been blocked for three months. I have been kind and only blocked you for the same period. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Chikku kuriakose

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Chikku kuriakose, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://chikkukuriakose.com/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:05, 16 November 2014 (UTC)