SHAHRUKH KHAN BALOUT

This is SHAHRUKH KHAN BALOUT's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 2) edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jamia_Millia_Islamia#Centre_for_Management_Studies. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

User:SHAHRUKH KHAN BALOUT/sandbox may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello! SHAHRUKH KHAN BALOUT, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 2) edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no references. It also does not state what country the department is in, let alone why it is notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SHAHRUKH KHAN BALOUT/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Centre for Management Studies, Jamia Millia Islamia edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SHAHRUKH KHAN BALOUT (talk) 06:35, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi Robert,

On the basis of your suggestions, I have defined the location of CMS exactly and whatever else required for this page you can talk to me about it. Thanks for your guidance and suggestions.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 3) edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft has no references, and so presents no case for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SHAHRUKH KHAN BALOUT/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 13:20, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Submission edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I said that your draft had no references, and didn't even say what country the organization is in. You added the country, but didn't add any references. Is English your first language? If so, please read up on our policies and guidelines, including Your first article about what is needed for an article. If not, please consider, since you seem to be having difficulty understanding our policies and guidelines, considering to one of our Wikipedias in approximately 200 languages. If you do understand English but still don't understand our policies and guidelines, please ask for advice at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:24, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 3) edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Individual university departments are almost never notable, see WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. The 1 single source added now is just to the department's own web page. Please do not resubmit without having read the links we provide to notability guidelines.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SHAHRUKH KHAN BALOUT/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Sam Sailor ^Talk! 18:11, 3 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, SHAHRUKH KHAN BALOUT! I'm Wiae. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. /wiae /tlk 12:48, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 4) edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SHAHRUKH KHAN BALOUT/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 17:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 4) edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Jamia Millia Islamia#Centre for Management Studies instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

To even be considered at all, this draft has to be 'significantly more comprehensive that the already existing section about this department in the art8cle about the university. Short answer: Forget it, and find something else to write about - something we do not already have an article about.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SHAHRUKH KHAN BALOUT/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 17:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 6) edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is still nowhere near as good as the already existing section at Jamia Millia Islamia#Centre for Management Studies. The "admission process" information violates both the promotion and not a guide rules. I really strongly suggest that you give up on this draft. The main article about the university already includes the apropriate information about this department.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SHAHRUKH KHAN BALOUT/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 09:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2016 edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, I'm Peterye2005. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Symbiosis Centre for Management Studies without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Peterye2005 (talk) 13:32, 15 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic