SECREngineNo592
Welcome SECREngineNo592!
I'm Walter Görlitz, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Dos and Don'ts:
|
| If you need further help, you can: | or you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own personal sandbox for use any time. It's perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. By the way, seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.
Please remember to:
- Always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to your talk page, and a timestamp. - Leave descriptive edit summaries for your edits. Doing so helps other editors understand what changes you have made and why you made them.
Sincerely, Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:33, 31 December 2019 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:33, 31 December 2019 (UTC)
January 2020 edit
Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, How the Grinch Stole Christmas! (TV special), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:44, 24 January 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at How the Grinch Stole Christmas! (TV special), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
Tell me how do I citing a reliable source then Walter Görlitz? How the Grinch Stole Christmas! (TV special) is distributed by Warner Bros. Television I tell yah. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SECREngineNo592 (talk • contribs) 02:44, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
- You have not read a single revert either now or when you were editing as an anon, have you?
- The field is not for the current distributor, but for the original distributor. So if you can prove the sourcing in the articles is wrong and that you supply a source for WB TV when they originally aired, you may update the infobox. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
I'm sorry Walter Görlitz. you are right and I am wrong. Do you forgive me? SECREngineNo592 (talk) 09:13, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
- Absolutely, and it's part of the learning process. Walter Görlitz (talk) 03:19, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
September 2020 edit
Please stop your disruptive editing.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at The Wind in the Willows (1996 film), you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:58, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
: I apologize for that and I hope you'll forgive me. In The Wind in the Willows (1996 film) page I see three distributions like Guild Pathé Cinema (UK), Walt Disney Pictures (US), and 20th Century Fox (Canada). Not i only see Guild Pathé Cinema on there and it questions me why the other two are removed. As a The Wind In The Willows fan myself, I've learned that in a behind the scenes, interviews, and on internet that the film did get distributed by 20th Century Fox in Canada and Walt Disney Pictures in the US as I also have a DVD copy of Mr. Toad's Wild Ride it showed Walt Disney Pictures logo in the beginning of the film. I thought you guys might have accidentally removed them by mistake. That's why I edit the distribution list. I've also researched on the film's release dates on IMDB for the US and Canada and thought I add those in too. How and who will I speek to the editor to explain about that before I ask permission to edit The Wind in the Willows (1996) page?--SECREngineNo592 (talk) 07:06, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Did you get my last message I sent to you on September 18th NinjaRobotPirate? SECREngineNo592 (talk) 18:58, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- The IMDb is not a reliable source, so it doesn't matter what it says. As I pointed out in the edit summary for your first edit, template:infobox film is clear that these distributors and release dates do not belong in the infobox. There is no reason to add random countries to the infobox of a British film. If we did that, the infobox would fill up with dozens of release dates and distributors from all around the world. By consensus, the release date and distributors listed in the infobox are limited to the country of origin. Please read the guidelines that people link to you. If you want to discuss the issue, you could always use the article's talk page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:10, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
I will try if I can. What and where is the article’s talk page so I know in the future? SECREngineNo592 (talk) 05:28, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Extreme point-of-view pushing on Thomas & Friends: All Engines Go! edit
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Thomas & Friends: All Engines Go!. Laplorfill (talk) 21:12, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Please stop, whether you are editing from this account, or when you are logged out. One more time and I'm taking this to the admins. You have been repeatedly warned that the material you are adding is unsuitable. Stop using Wikipedia to push your personal point of view. The material is improperly sourced and is full of blatant misrepresentations of the sources it does use. If you want to discuss adding some version of this, you must discus it on the article's talk page and gain a consensus on what to add. The current form is highly inappropriate. Laplorfill (talk) 21:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
I apologize and I would like to discuss adding some version for the All Engines Go page to article’s talk page and get that over with, if you send a like and show me how so I could do it. That was the information you guys added before you guys stated changing again for unknown season which the original was good and dose not need to be changed so many times, someone I know noticed the change on the Reception and tries to change it back but I just keeps changing again, that’s why I tried adding the original information back based on what me and my friend has seen and researched which they are true and the fact that I too am a Thomas Fan. SECREngineNo592 (talk) 05:11, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Discussion should take place on the article's talk page, which is here: Talk:Thomas & Friends: All Engines Go!. The problems with the section you are trying to edit have been explained in depth in the edit comments for the article, which are here. The information you were adding was deeply biased and much of it was untrue. Here's a very clear example of what I mean: the text you added said "Veronica Chambers (daughter of the Wilbert Awdry) was highly dismayed and appalled with the new series" but what Chambers actually said was: "I don't like it very much". That's a gross misrepresentation of what Chambers said, and this absolutely isn't allowed in Wikipedia articles. There are many, many other problems with the text you were putting in place, this is just one example. Please read some of Wikipedia's cor policies, notably WP:V, WP:NPOV and WP:NOR which you must follow. Laplorfill (talk) 23:17, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
Okay thanks, I am going to go to that talk page and discuss what to chose or change for the Receptions when ever I have time to. SECREngineNo592 (talk) 01:34, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Okay I've just made a section on Talk:Thomas & Friends: All Engines Go!. SECREngineNo592 (talk) 02:10, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
The history of the beginnings and resells from audience of All Engines Go edit
Here's a history of All Engines Go. After the Announcement on October, Sodor Island Forums & Fansite made a Blog of interviewing Campbell Bryer from Nelvana about the changes of the Reboot. Then on January 23rd Britt Allcroft made a message on Facebook. The on January 27th the leak trailer came out and all fans hate it, including few parents and their kids. On January 28th a Fan got a respond from Wilbert Awdry's daught Veronica Chambers saying that she did not like it at all. On September 10th, lot of articles about Parents and their kids hating All Engines Go even more and said that the 2D Thomas is terrifying, There's even a news paper article from The SUN. And finally when All Engines Go is out on September 13th, IMDb rating is so amazingly terribly low, even lower than Barney. As a Thomas Fan myself I've went through those events and saw blog, post, tweet and articles.
Here are the links you can use to add for the Thomas & Friends: All Engines Go Wikipedia Page;)
1: http://thesifblog.blogspot.com/2020/11/thomas-2021-what-to-expect.html
2: https://www.facebook.com/BrittAllcroft/posts/3982412085126569
3: https://twitter.com/TywynWharf2002/status/1354807205216755718
4: (Lot of Articles: https://twitter.com/Tetsus_999/status/1436377979555401771) (Newspaper: https://twitter.com/TEngine7/status/1436306769060507673) (The SUN: https://www.thesun.co.uk/tv/16097405/thomas-tank-engine-makeover-frightening/ (DailyMail: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9975903/Thomas-Tank-Engines-new-cartoon-look-menacing-children-CRY.html?ito=social-facebook&fbclid=IwAR05bNdqopwyAAVCVfeH_COEYlgIAwv41490stGEr5Pf7byFZcsUAH-3fX8)
5: Rick Suvalle clarifying it's not S25 https://twitter.com/RickSuvalle/status/1432396289346465794
SECREngineNo592 (talk) 03:41, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
November 2023 edit
Hi SECREngineNo592! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Bounty (chocolate bar) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Bounty (chocolate bar), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. If an article says that a product is "available via import sales" it is unnecessary to highlight one store in particular.. Belbury (talk) 12:45, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Okay thanks. I've just sent a message in Talk:Bounty (chocolate bar)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 28 November 2023 (UTC)