User talk:SDPatrolBot/Archive/2011/March
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Kingpin13 in topic K-League 'FAN'tastic Player
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Adebisi Shank
What do I have to do to stop you deleting this page? Adebisi Shank — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephenmusic (talk • contribs)
Escalation past level 3
See User talk:Stephen.bedser. The bot gave Level 1, 2 and 3 warnings, then did not escalate further but simply issued a further four L3 warnings. Should it not go on to Level 4 and then report at AIV as some bots do? Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:50, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hi John, this was discussed in the errors section, but it just got archived (here's a link). Basically, as I said there, it's always made sense to me to not report to AIV (and therefore not escalate the warning past level 3), because by re-adding the CSD tag the bot is already requesting an admin to look at the situation, so there's not much benefit to using AIV, and a slight risk that the bot will make erroneous reports (i.e. it doesn't seem worth it, although it would be fairly easy technically). - Kingpin13 (talk) 06:21, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
- Well, up to you, but I don't see any problem with it reporting to AIV, even if it sometimes gets it wrong - MrZ-Bot quite often reports false positives, and nobody minds (at least, I don't). If you're not going to AIV, then it makes sense to stick at L3, because you don't want to issue a string of L4 "This is your last warning" messages. I guess such a long string won't occur often - CAT:CSD has been heavily backlogged the last few days, over 100 most of the time, so there were long delays. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:20, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
I don't understand why this article have delete tag? Please let me know how to remove delete tag. Footwiks (talk)
- Hi Footwiks. You should not remove the tag yourself, since you created the page. However, I've removed it for you as it doesn't seem to be about a website. Despite this, I am not convinced the page meets our standards for inclusion, and it needs some work cleaning up and establishing notability. - Kingpin13 (talk) 13:28, 12 March 2011 (UTC)