User talk:SD0001/StubSorter
![]() | Stub sorting | |||
|
Suggestion
editI think the stub sorter should get disabled ONLY if you are on an article with more than 4,500 bytes. That way people can't stub long articles. Just an idea ------[] /\/\/\ /\ []-------- GDFan 19:02, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Null edit
edit@SD0001 Not sure how this happened. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 01:54, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- @1234qwer1234qwer4 you clikced save without changing any tags? It doesn't look like StubSorter would bail out on not seeing changes in tags, so it tried an edit anyway, which would normally not actually cause an edit – but here an extra newline was added per MOS:LAYOUT, so the edit got registered. – SD0001 (talk) 04:19, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- @SD0001 Oh, yes, I had figured it out after accidentally doing another such edit, thanks. Maybe the script could be prevented from performing null/cosmetic edits? ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 11:32, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
- @SD0001 Oh, yes, I had figured it out after accidentally doing another such edit, thanks. Maybe the script could be prevented from performing null/cosmetic edits? ~~~~
Consider changing the menu text from Stub Sort to Stub Sorter
editI was trying to figure out which stub sorting script I had installed today and I had to dig a bit. Having the menu display "Stub Sorter" instead of "Stub Sort" would be helpful for script identification. –Novem Linguae (talk) 04:09, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
- Is it that hard to figure out? Personally, I would prefer shorter names for script portlets as a Monobook user as to not cause them to run off the screen. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 06:03, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate stub templates
editSpecial:Diff/1145639037, Special:Diff/1145638847, Special:Diff/1145638673, Special:Diff/1145638521, Special:Diff/1145638257 should be avoided. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:33, 20 March 2023 (UTC)