User talk:SCΛRECROW/Archive2

Spam vandal

Hello, I see you reverted a spam vandal on Glock this morning. If you see more of him, you may want to mention it where I have filed at the entry to blacklist him. I've already mentioned this mornings events there. Thank you,
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 14:22, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Now blacklisted.
⋙–Berean–Hunter—► ((⊕)) 20:51, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Deletion on D7000's texts

Hello, I saw that you deleted some of my texts regarding the Nikon D7000, which I considered an impolite action. If you would like to add data, be free to do it; but don't simply delete texts that others have carefully written and revised. Thank you, Paulo Feitosa <pfeitosa@gmail.com>. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pfeitosa (talk • contribs) 17:51, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

I copy editied it so it read better and cited references properly. I did not think that "User Responses" was an appropriate section. And yet you removed my additions of a proper reception section and the citations. SCΛRECROW 05:13, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

lightsaber

excuse me, but was the point of taking away a picture? RCSprinter123 (talk) 19:42, 6 March 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, all I saw was the messed up ref. The picture is restored now.SCΛRECROW 02:05, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

B-52 Edit

May I ask why my edit was undone? I believe I did everything correctly with perfectly accurate information. (P.S. I'm new to editing Wikipedia so I hope I'm asking you this in the correct location.)Jlk18000 (talk) 08:14, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Basically, you did not reference any reliable sources when you added that information and I could not find a reference to support that information either.SCΛRECROW 14:23, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

PS: I think BilCat also answered your question by adding the hidden comment "Only appropriate for single designers, not project leaders" to the designers field of the infobox. SCΛRECROW 14:25, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Alright, I'll attempt to look to see if I can find any information supporting it, and see If theres a more appropriate location for the information. Thanks. Jlk18000 (talk) 19:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Also, quick comment, maybe I'm not understanding the difference between "Project Leaders" and "Single Designers". My edit (Designer Name) was the single designer.Jlk18000 (talk) 19:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

No problem. You'll have to ask BilCat about the difference between "Project Leaders" and "Single Designers".SCΛRECROW 04:18, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Nikon D7000 placement

Hello, SCΛRECROW. You have new messages at Template talk:Nikon DSLR cameras.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

D7000 Specs

First of all, and without wasting much more time with YOU DUDES, I would very much like to reiterate that you are an audience of exactly ONE INDIVIDUAL EACH and Wikipedia is not solely for YOU. As well, I would like to reiterate that I would like to see the full specs on there and remind you that neither of YOU are qualified to distinguish what information I, nor the rest of the world, might find "Useful" so long as it is relevant. Does that make sense to you?

This speaks directly to the fact that my post contained ALOT more content than that little box does. And no, it couldn't POSSIBLY be more relevant. THAT WAS KINDA THE POINT DUDE. GET IT? So you call me a spammer? I think you are absolutely ridiculous! That was a HUGE contribution and I feel, a much needed one. "I think that is all we need to know." Shove it; these principles are at the very heart of Wikipedia. So whereas I may be relatively new, don't lecture me dude because I know at least that much.

As well, I would like to point out that half of the sources cited (to the very page) are Affiliated with Amazon dude (since you're checking) right along with just about every other site on the internet. Hell, I'll bet you are too! Which means that you may know: that snippet on the Contact Us page is apart to the Amazon TOS. In fact, ALL of those very people (cited, right there on the same page) aught to post that same snippet if they haven't already. So, tell me again what's appropriate you fool. That IS the deal for you, me, them, the rest of us: we all make our great contributions of free, relevant, and quality content/services --- and we hope to get paid a little somewhere down the line! Sound familiar dude? So tell me again, what is "inappropriate"? Sounds like a little hypocrisy to me... And if you might actually think about that for a but a second, it might sound the same to you. GET IT?

Fortunately, Wiki too has a TOS. As well, they have shot at getting around demi-gods like you. BTW, love how you killed the free press! Way to go Champ!

-RS

Thank you for your incoherent and contradictory commentary. :) SCΛRECROW 03:30, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

You should try reading it. Or perhaps you've lost track of the conversation?

I don't know, learn how to read, put it into context, THEN try to redefine 'contradictory'.

I think you should be working in that order anyway...

Seriously though, you should at least learn how to articulate a proper sentence. :) -RS

Cite: your reply — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.42.7.168 (talk) 03:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Simply put, I reverted your edit because it contained too much information that was already present in the article. The external link that you cited did not seem to be reliable or notable either. I never accused you of being a spammer or being associated with Amazon.com. BTW, I fixed my grammatical error. SCΛRECROW 04:16, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Do me a favor, define Reliable and Notable. It used to be that by citing something, you were simply identifying the source. Now, I respect that we're all trying to keep Wiki as accurate and integral as possible but then, I did contribute accurate and viable content. Further, you may also note that the site is a reliable source of THAT information (and it is reliable, thank you very much). BTW, I fixed my grammatical error too. lol -RS— Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.42.7.168 (talk) 03:42, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

(Both of them) lolol :) -RS — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.42.7.168 (talk) 04:43, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Notability (web) and Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. It did not seem that the site you supplied met the criteria in these guidelines. SCΛRECROW 07:17, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks to SCΛRECROW

Thanks for the quick fix to Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon (video game)'s Infobox ProResearcher (talk) 09:51, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

No worries. SCΛRECROW 11:51, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

let me guess

your name is based off the matthew reilly novels? 58.167.196.164 (talk) 00:02, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Indeed it is. SCΛRECROW 01:12, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

this is quite creepy then, im aussie, use scarecrow for most of my user names, im a gamer, studiying media at tafe, do photography as a hobby and im pretty much a walking book on firearms and military..... you're not just me using the internet from the future? haha Scarecrow398 (talk) 05:06, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Wow, we sound quite similar. You probably read my user page. I usually use "SCΛRECROW" or "[SCARECROW]" around the Internet. And no, I don't think I've mastered time travel yet. :P Anyway, welcome to Wikipedia. SCΛRECROW 08:12, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

haha thanks, only im in SA not VIC (assuming seeing the monash tag) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scarecrow398 (talk • contribs) 06:25, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

nikon v1 j1

i guess you are preparing a page already? Both cameras on one page? i think its easier.

And an electronic mirror is somehow a mirror, look at panasonic etc. And its mainly for navigation.77.12.91.228 (talk) 13:00, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Haha, no I've been quite busy. Besides someone has already beaten me to it: Nikon 1 series, Nikon 1 J1 and Nikon 1 V1. I might work on them sometime later though. Well, I think the template should be renamed if we want to include EVIL cameras. SCΛRECROW 00:33, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Supreme commander soundtrack.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Supreme commander soundtrack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 09:32, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

• Hi. I took the liberty of adding the cover art file to the infobox for the album on the Supreme commander page. I'll keep watch and if in 5 days nothing has changed I'll remove the deletion tag from the file. -- fg^TC 10:28, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for that. SCΛRECROW 01:19, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

NP & YW :) Unfortunately it appears the reasoning for its removal is strong. -- fg^TC 12:51, 8 October 2011 (UTC)