January 2018

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of largest stars has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:45, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 18:46, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SASHALOVESBUTTERS2018420699111337 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I now understand that I was being foolish for what I have done. Please unblock me, and then I will nake useful contributions to WP instead. --SASHALOVESBUTTERS2018420699111337 (talk) 18:48, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirms this is block evasion. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:01, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The reviewing admin may wish to note this account's involvement in the pattern of unprovoked personal attacks/harassment emerging at User talk:JoeyPknowsalotaboutthat. –72 (talk) 18:50, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Specifically, this, and this; basically death threats, violation of WP:NPA. theinstantmatrix (talk) 18:51, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Was more alluding to the presence of other accounts [1],[2]72 (talk) 18:55, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SASHALOVESBUTTERS2018420699111337 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am not the same person as Joey. Joey thinks that UY Scuti is the largest star (WHEN IT IS BUTTERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) and I hate him. I am clearly a different person and I am using his computer to get him into trouble with the checkusers.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. - Barek (talkcontribs) - 03:49, 28 February 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.