Welcome!

Hello, S0berage, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, you can post to the help desk or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! EdwinHJ | Talk 04:04, 7 September 2005 (UTC)Reply


I glad you liked the editing on Arbogast. You'll get used to people "relentlessly editing"; it's what we do here<g>. For what it's worth, there are a few conventions on dates: for links to work, just link the "number" part of the year and leave the AD or CE outside the brackets. (Same thing with things like 15 September; it will work if you link [[15 September]] or [[September 15]], but [[September 15th]] won't work. Not to worry too much; if it doesn't link up someone will be along to edit it! - Nunh-huh 03:24, 8 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Image:Meshaallavrov.JPG

edit

Hello. May I ask why you tagged this image with {{attribution}} when you uploaded it ? Looks like a copyright violation to me. Do you own Reuters ? Have you paid Reuters for the rights to use it in Wikipedia ? I've listed it at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are interested in it not being deleted, please go there and present your case. -- PFHLai 17:28, 4 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Take it easy, S0berage. Sarcasm ? I was giving examples in which the {{attribution}} tag might be applicable. No clue why you got so upset or what you meant by my making a big deal. I have no clue who you are, either. You could be a professional photographer with access to such photos. You could also possibly be the owner of a community newspaper somewhere and had actually paid for the image use for your paper and decided to use the image in Wikipedia. How would I know ? I asked on your talkpage. .... Never mind. The image has been deleted. ... Relax, pal. You did good work last summer. Hope you revert to your old form after the block expires. Take care. --PFHLai 16:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)Reply
Condescending ? Well, sorry that I've made you feel that way. Welcome back, anyway. Happy editing. :-) --PFHLai 11:41, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism of George W. Bush article

edit

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Fire Star 05:22, 8 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

This is not the way we communicate with each other around here. Don't vandalize pages anymore like this and in the George W Bush article. Thanks!--MONGO 05:26, 8 March 2006 (UTC)Reply


 

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Canada, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- xaosflux Talk/CVU 05:27, 8 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

 

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy: There is no excuse for personal attacks on other contributors. Do not make them. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that you may be blocked for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thanks, -- Tawker 05:28, 8 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Temp block

edit
  You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. Fire Star 05:28, 8 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

EDIT!

edit

S0berage 07:55, 8 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Block

edit

Your block should be exprired by now, and you are welcome to make helpful edits. You may want to read some of the pages in your welcome message above. xaosflux Talk/CVU 00:48, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Welcome back

edit

I can see you've done some good editing here in the past, so welcome back. Cheers! --Fire Star 01:53, 10 March 2006 (UTC)Reply