Duplicate images uploaded

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:OutsideChapel.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:ChapelOutside.jpg. The copy called Image:ChapelOutside.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 04:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:HdrLogo.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading Image:HdrLogo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:11, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Chase Tower (Lafayette)

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Chase Tower (Lafayette) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --CWY2190TC 04:56, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

No content: Iberia Bank Tower

edit
 

The Iberia Bank Tower article you contributed has no content besides an infobox and gives no indication why this building is notable. Please describe what the building is and why it is notable and cite sources before an editor marks it as a candidate for speedy deletion. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 24 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Iberia Bank Tower

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Iberia Bank Tower, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Iberia Bank Tower. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 25 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Iberia Bank Tower

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Iberia Bank Tower, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iberia Bank Tower. Thank you. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Iberia Bank Tower.jpeg listed for deletion

edit

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Iberia Bank Tower.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. David Eppstein (talk) 03:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Chase Tower (Lafayette)

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chase Tower (Lafayette), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

non notable building

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Stormbay (talk) 03:16, 21 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Chase Tower.jpeg

edit
 

The file File:Chase Tower.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Uploaded for Chase Tower (Lafayette). No other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 12:37, 22 September 2022 (UTC)Reply