Rvplpr

Welcome!

Hello, Rvplpr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ES&L 09:53, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article

Your draft article User:Rvplpr/sandbox will not be moved into main article space as it currently stands. Please read WP:N / WP:V / WP:RS and WP:NPOV and then apply them to your article. When you have the content of the article cited to reliable third party sources and the content is stated in a non promotional manner, then you can ask for someone to review your draft for moving into article space (you can use the {help me} as described in the welcome section above). -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Cary Lee Peterson article

You presumably looked up the information about Ms. Peterson in third-party reliable sources, but you didn't include citations or in-line references, so that we don't know what the sources were. That is the most obvious problem. A second problem is that your article appears to be promotional rather than neutral. That can be worked. Also, don't forum shop by raising the same issue (the non-acceptance of your article) in two places, such as the Teahouse (a reasonable place to ask) and WP:ANI (an unreasonable place to ask, since article acceptance is a content issue, not a conduct issue for admin action). Robert McClenon (talk) 22:16, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

one place to look for reliable third party sources is news.google.com if you ignore the blog hits, most of the other hits will be from acceptable sources. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 04:31, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Guys- thanks so much for your input and support. The content that appeared to be promotional has been removed. The references have been made and final edits from my end. The only news articles mentioned were from Associated Press. Very new to submitting articles but I'm aware that a valid article must hold to strictly the facts and not hearsay or promotional material. Please help me get this article edited and listed for finalization. (Rvplpr (talk) 06:20, 3 October 2013 (UTC))

October 3, 2013 - The article was edited one last time. some minor modifications and proofing. It appears that the article is indeed ready. References and everything look well and its needing the help of an administrator at this point. Thanks [all] for your support on this matter.(Rvplpr (talk) 01:13, 4 October 2013 (UTC))

Why do you need an admin? You don't need one to submit this userspace article to AFC. I would consider removing your "media" section however; the article really isn't a repository for Mr. Peterson's SEC filings, radio appearances, and minor mentions on the internet. 205.166.218.65 (talk) 21:45, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

October 4, 2013 - @User talk:205.166.218.65: Thanks so much for your response and remarks. I have to mention again I am new to this create, review, and submission process with Wiki articles.

"Media" section was an edit done by someone else. I am not sure who did this. The SEC filings that Peterson signed to as CEO to the company with the government contracts should not be considered "Media" content. They are public records and considered as press releases or interim reports with the US federal government to my knowledge. Would this not be considered a career achievements [Signing negotiating and signing these major contracts to aid climate change and human rights]? The radio interviews support the personal description of Mr. Peterson's career and efforts as a philanthropist that is helping America and Africa. I found several other news articles but they were either released by a public relations group hired by Peterson's associates or not published by a credible source as BBC or AP. I do not find the UN archives as "Media" content either. This appears to be records of activity more political. "Media" is a broad term. Whether it be a published article or government filing to the public I would assume they are all considered full disclosures, thus, considered as "media". Please add your suggestions for edits to make all of this content fall into the correct category. Thanks for all of you support and help with this article. (Rvplpr (talk) 02:07, 5 October 2013 (UTC))

If you're going to have an article about this individual, the bad MUST be included, if it's properly sourced. Otherwise, non eed for the article. Wikipedia is not here to puff up a person ES&L 10:06, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

October 5, 2013 - What do you mean 'bad'? All factually data there is no 'bad', just neutral facts. I found 500 press articles and a handful of blogs. These are not facts. They are opinionated. The references on record are all facts. I'm trying to understand your posting. (Rvplpr (talk) 11:48, 5 October 2013 (UTC))

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cary Lee Peterson (2) (November 5)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cary Lee Peterson (2).
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 23:47, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cary Lee Peterson (2) (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cary Lee Peterson (2).
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Faddle 23:22, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Rvplpr, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cary Lee Peterson (2) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cary Lee Peterson (2), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cary Lee Peterson (2)

Hello Rvplpr. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Cary Lee Peterson (2)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cary Lee Peterson (2)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. C679 10:09, 9 December 2014 (UTC)