Welcome to Wikipedia

edit

Hello, Ruthhstraussmd, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --CiaPan (talk) 08:13, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Username

edit

Your username seems to reveal your real identity. Although it is not forbidden by Wikipedia:Username policy, it may sometimes cause unpredicted results. Please read related notice at the WP:REALNAME section of the policy page.

You may also want to read the Guidance for new users there.

If you decide you want to change your name, see WP:UNC. Be aware, however, the new username can be traced back to the previous one. If you want to avoid that, the best option will be abandoning the current name and registering some completely new. In such case remember to never return to the old name – editing alternatively or simultaneously from two or more accounts can be considered sock-puppetry, which is forbidden with a very few exceptions (see Wikipedia:Sock puppetry).

Best regards, CiaPan (talk) 08:48, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Attempting to help you.

edit

Hello, I saw that you have posted several requests for help at the help desk. You seem confused. Here are some answers to some of your questions that may help you.

  1. When you post to the help desk, it is immediately visible at the bottom of that page, until newer posts move it up. That is a public space, where you are asking for help from whomever happens by. People will generally answer on that page, so you need to go back and look for responses to your questions. Right now there are several responses to the three questions you have posted there. You can find your questions and the responses to them at Wikipedia:Help_desk#Book_creation, Wikipedia:Help_desk#Where do I find answers from this desk??, and Wikipedia:Help desk#POSTING A SOURCE.
  2. This page, which I am using to talk to you now, is your User talk page. User talk pages are used to communicate with a specific person. Please be aware that, although user talk pages are used to have individual conversations, they are not private. There is no means of sending private messages on Wikipedia.
  3. I am so glad you are already trying to contribute sources! Thank you so much. The problem, however, with this edit, is that we don't know what information in the article that interview is intended to support. (There are other problems too, but those are easy enough for more experienced editors to fix.) If you will tell me what information it supports, and (if possible), copy and paste the URL of where I can find the interview, I will be happy to properly format it and then give you a link to a diff that shows what I did so that you can replicate it in the future. In the mean time, some pages that you can read or look at to get more help with citations include: Referencing for beginners, Citing sources, and Reliable sources.
  4. Generally speaking, people respond wherever the discussion was started. So, responses to your help desk posts are on the help desk. If you want to respond to me about anything I've said above, respond here. I'll keep an eye on this for a few days, but if you want to be sure to get someone's attention, you should ping them, by typing "{{U|username}}", so to get my attention, for example, you would type {{U|ONUnicorn}}, and to get your attention on a page other than this one I would type, {{U|Ruthhstraussmd}}.

I'm sorry Wikipedia is so confusing for newcomers. However, if you have any questions or need to know how to do something or what rule or policy applies in a specific situation, ask me. I'll be happy to help. Or ask at the help desk, where there are lots of friendly (and a few not-so-friendly) people who are also willing to help. ~ ONUnicorn(Talk|Contribs)problem solving 15:42, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

fab 5 freddy

edit

If you can find the interview on npr.org website, I'll help add a reference to it in the external links.Naraht (talk) 20:25, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

@Naraht: The podcast can be found at this page:
q: The Podcast from CBC Radio
https://www.npr.org/podcasts/456707185/q-the-podcast
and listened to at this link:
JULY 16, 2019
Fab 5 Freddy: How hip-hop evolved into the most dominant genre in the world
Fab 5 Freddy is a visual artist, veejay, filmmaker and hip-hop historian. He joined Tom Power to discuss hip-hop's early beginnings and the role he played in its evolution into a huge cultural influence.
https://podcast-a.akamaihd.net/mp3/podcasts/qpodcast-KLTm9RYQ-20190716.mp3?siteplayer=true&dl=1
but I have no idea how long those links will remain valid.   CiaPan (talk) 14:16, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
CiaPan True, but still I think this is more than enough information to include. The primary question is whether to include this as an external link, or whether it is to be used as a reference. Ruthhstraussmd, I presume that you have listened to it. Is there additional information that can be added based on this, and/or information that is currently in the article which can be referenced to it?Naraht (talk) 14:42, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
@Naraht: You aksed - I found it - so here it is.   But honestly, I doubt we can use it at all! The link is likely to rot soon (the list presents recent podcasts, and there's no information about how long individual podcasts are kept at a website). I suppose they may disappear in a few weeks, a few months at most. Then all information based on the listening will suddenly become unsourced... --CiaPan (talk) 15:08, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply
CiaPan Given that q the podcast originally comes from the cbc, I went looking there. I think a link to https://www.cbc.ca/radio/q/fab-5-freddy-on-how-hip-hop-evolved-into-the-most-dominant-genre-in-the-world-1.5212384 should be good enough. And just because something went "out of print" , doesn't make it less referencable. I'd still feel more comfortable if it was a reference than a standalone EL.Naraht (talk) 15:17, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply