RuslanTheEditor

Welcome!

Hello, RuslanTheEditor, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Australian Society of Orthodontists, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! creffett (talk) 23:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Australian Society of Orthodontists

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Australian Society of Orthodontists, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. creffett (talk) 23:24, 23 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Australian Society of Orthodontists

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Australian Society of Orthodontists requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Daiyusha (talk) 19:14, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Real estate development. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 14:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Thanks. alright

January 2020

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Lingual braces, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Praxidicae (talk) 12:00, 14 January 2020 (UTC)

Why is it a spam? How can I argue this statement? Thanks

Property Update moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Property Update, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:22, 23 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Property Update (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Property Update and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Property Update, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:45, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Hello, RuslanTheEditor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:45, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Hello RuslanTheEditor. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:RuslanTheEditor. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=RuslanTheEditor|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Praxidicae (talk) 14:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi. I am not directly or indirectly linked to the organisation. Am I suppose to tell it here? Thanks Praxidicae (talk)

Then how are you the copyright holder of all these photos including the logo of a company? Praxidicae (talk) 14:18, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

I am not. Sorry for that. Please lead the way to extricate.

Quite frankly, I do not believe you. Every edit you've made is promoting Yardney's work and other various spam outlets. It's better to be upfront on Wikipedia. Praxidicae (talk) 14:22, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Please also explain how several of those photos were the original copies which are not available online. Praxidicae (talk) 14:30, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

I confused the pictures issue with article editing, sorry. I am not English native. All the pictures were found on the web. I though wikidata has nothing to do with Wikipedia and a separate project. We are uploading the information to wikidata cause we think that google recognises it as an authoritative source to render in the knowledge graph. But I had no idea wikidata is so strictly monitored and has such strict policies.

What document we need to provide to avoid copywriting issue? Thanks, sorry for the mess up— Preceding unsigned comment added by RuslanTheEditor (talk • contribs)

Well first, you need to amend your previous statement. What is your connection to the people and things you're writing about and who is we? Because earlier you just claimed no affiliation. So which is it? Praxidicae (talk) 14:57, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, I am confused. I am feeling my way around wikipedia and have no affiliation to any of the aforementioned. Testing out a few theories about google, but no one hired me to do this. I found pictures on the web and ready to delete them — Preceding unsigned comment added by RuslanTheEditor (talk • contribs)

That does not answer my question in the slightest. Where did you get the three photos of Leanne Spring, Mandy Dyke and at least two others - which appeared to be the original but were not available from where you claim. Also WP:SIGN your edits using ~~~~Praxidicae (talk) 15:17, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Property Update concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Property Update, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Property Update

Hello, RuslanTheEditor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Property Update".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:58, 10 September 2020 (UTC)