Welcome! edit

Hello, RufusL1948, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! BusterD (talk) 04:08, 31 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Major German Horton Hunt Emory, Esq. (1882-1918) (January 5) edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


 
Hello! RufusL1948, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your recent edits edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:55, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, we don't need photos of Woodrow Wilson on the page; the only photos should be ones that absolutely directly involve Emory. Not the Capitol, not other military officers, not his ancestors (or their works), but only things like the man himself, a monument that explicitly has his name on it, etc. The draft is just way, way crowded with tangential photos. If people want photos of Wilson, they can click on the words Woodrow Wilson. So far as ancestors, either they're famous enough to have their own article with their photo on it, or they aren't famous and so we don't need a photo of them either.

You've put some good work into the article, but it's taking some untangling, and addressing the photos will help out. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:46, 16 January 2014 (UTC) Matthew, Thanks so much. That's very helpful. I'll make corrections. This is my first Wiki page, so I really appreciate your assistance. RufusL1948 16:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Matthew, Thanks for your comment on getting too off subject. I'll work on it over the next couple of days. Best regards, RufusL1948 15:05, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Suggestions edit

 
Hello, RufusL1948. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Major German Horton Hunt Emory, Esq. (1882-1918).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

undefined

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question on Major German Horton Hunt Emory, Esq. (1882-1918) edit

  Hello, RufusL1948! I'm Anon126. I have replied to your question on the Articles for Creation Help Desk about Major German Horton Hunt Emory, Esq. (1882-1918).
You can read it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#Review of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Major German Horton Hunt Emory, Esq. (1882-1918). Anon126 (talk - contribs) 01:27, 6 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Talkback edit

 
Hello, RufusL1948. You have new messages at Anon126's talk page.
Message added 03:39, 24 February 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Anon126 (talk - contribs) 03:39, 24 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Major German Horton Hunt Emory, Esq. (1882-1918) (February 28) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Major German Horton Hunt Emory, Esq. (1882-1918) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!
  • Please remember to link to the submission!
RufusL1948 12:39, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

I'll clean it up. No problem. Thanks for looking at it. RufusL1948 12:39, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014 edit

  Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus, as you did to German Horton Hunt Emory. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains under way. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:23, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Abuse of the AfC process edit

Our Articles for Creation process is designed to have our experienced editors review and approve or decline new article submissions. You had no business unilaterally moving that article out of AfC to the main namespace. Your behavior in this regard really puts a sour taste in my mouth.

While I am sure that you're emotionally-invested in German Horton Hunt Emory, editors will be less forgiving in the main namespace. You have large portions of unreferenced text that could be removed. You have portions that read like a glowing testimonial and that content may be cut, too.

I recommend you read our guidelines and policies before you make further edits. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:42, 28 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Chris, I'm sorry if I acted unilaterally. I made all the changes that editors had requested and I saw that another editor said they weren't going to clean it up , so I did as it had been dragging on for quite sometime, and there is a very significant backlog in the AFIs. I do have about 50 citations and 50 wiki links, so it seems very well documented to me. But your point is well made and I will take to heart. If there are parts of the article that are over reaching and should come down I will understand but I really did sincerely think everything was very well documented. RufusL1948 18:11, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

 

The article New Apartment project at 1100 Key Highway, Baltimore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A proposed building is not notable. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Large portions of the article are directly copied from the sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 04:38, 2 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

I see you moved it, and it is now at Draft:New Apartment project at 1100 Key Highway, Baltimore. There are still concerns which need addressing. It needs independent sources, and to be rewritten instead of copying text from other websites. – Fayenatic London 14:25, 2 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Will do. Thanks so much for your time and assistance. 76.100.79.86 (talk) 14:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC) RufusL1948 14:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:New Apartment project at 1100 Key Highway, Baltimore edit

  Draft:New Apartment project at 1100 Key Highway, Baltimore, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:New Apartment project at 1100 Key Highway, Baltimore and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:New Apartment project at 1100 Key Highway, Baltimore during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 10:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: German Horton Hunt (March 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:  The comment they left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:German Horton Hunt edit

 

Hello, RufusL1948. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "German Horton Hunt".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 21:59, 15 December 2016 (UTC)Reply