RubyJester
Monetary Reform edit
Beautiful. Nice and clear and simple and non-controversial and elegantly written. Great job.--Socppt15 (talk) 02:35, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks Socppt15, I appreciate it. - RubyJester (talk) 13:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC)
I agree, I think the reliable source criteria should be expanded for many things that, for one thing or another, won't be covered in traditional sources, not to mention I wouldn't describe sites like Gamespot or IGN as reliable, in my view they're not more trustworthy than the usual fan forum.
I provided two sources to David Fuchs for consideration as sources of differences between the normal and the special editions, but so far did not receive any message from him regarding their inclusion (being an administrator and everything). Considering that the Special Edition is the ultimate Wipeout 3, to see its importance minimized to a mere mention of a possible difference with the normal edition (expressed in a non-encyclopedic tone by the way, because it's talking about probability), and backed by a source that only criticises such characteristic in the standard release, it's a real shame, and more considering that with the current reliability rules, it's almost impossible to see the game included again. --Lashiec (talk) 21:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Category:Futuristic racing games has been nominated for renaming edit
Category:Futuristic racing games has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 22:25, 8 February 2022 (UTC)