Orphaned non-free image File:Owls foundation O logo x 300.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Owls foundation O logo x 300.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nick⁠—⁠Contact/Contribs 17:20, 9 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Owls Foundation (June 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by FoCuSandLeArN was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:32, 16 June 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Rowntreemedia, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:32, 16 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your email

edit

Thanks for your e-mail. I don't recall offering to help with the creation of any article. If your or your colleague has received a message from someone purporting to be me, I would very much like to see it. As you will see from the message above, your draft has been reviewed and rejected. If you need help, please ask at the Tea House. Thanks.--ukexpat (talk) 03:49, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

June 2015

edit
 
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice. Thank you. Randykitty (talk) 10:29, 17 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rowntreemedia (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I have changed my username to dymchurchbeach Rowntreemedia (talk) 08:14, 18 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Accept reason:

I've welcomed your new account. PhilKnight (talk) 22:32, 18 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Draft:The Owls Foundation concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Owls Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:41, 19 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:The Owls Foundation

edit
 

Hello, Rowntreemedia. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Owls Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 10:19, 19 December 2015 (UTC)Reply