Rowan North

Rowan North, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rowan North! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:02, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Blade Runner (franchise) moved to draftspace

I've moved your article Blade Runner (franchise) to Draft:Blade Runner (franchise), where you can work on it until the ghostbusters stuff has been changed over to Blade Runner info. When don't you can move it back over yourself or ask me. Cheers.

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Versions of Blade Runner into Draft:Blade Runner (franchise). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:52, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:True-Laurie-Strode.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:True-Laurie-Strode.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nthep (talk) 22:37, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017

User:Berean Hunter

@ User:Berean Hunter: Would you mind adding the below section to Kingsman (franchise)? Thank you very much. Also, @User:DarthBotto, you do realise that I was 12 at that time, right? I didn't really know how Wikipedia worked at the time, so you can forgive me for "editing wrong", and I mistook you for another user. (Note: It isn't nice to call anyone "ignorant and pig-headed". Would you call anyone that IRL?) Also, while I'm at it, and I've been meaning to say this, I haven't the faintest clue who either User:GolfingIreland or User:Marty Smith are, or why you think they're me. Now, I don't actually know what it is that I did wrong here that led to the first ban. To the best of my knowledge I followed Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Legitimate uses, not Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts. Could someone explain to me what exactly it was that I did incorrectly? and why do you keep banning me? All it is that I desire is to make Wikipedia a better place. I don't use this website every waking hour, so I honestly really don't understand why you're both spending so much time hunting me. Rowan North (talk) 16:31, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

I do not proxy edits for blocked sockpuppets. To understand why you were blocked, begin here.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 02:37, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Kingsman: The Big Exit

Kingsman: The Big Exit was released in the September/October 2017 issue of Playboy Magazine, written by Rob Williams with art from Ozgur Yildirim. Although marketed by Playboy as a one-shot installment of the Millarverse, the protagonist of The Big Exit is referred to as Gary "Eggsy" Unwin, the name of the films' protagonist, rather than the comic's protagonist, Gary "Eggsy" London. Therefore, the comic is set within both the continuity of the Kingsman comic series and the Kingsman film series. The issue follows Eggsy as he accompanies £100 billion in gold to Brussels, which is due to be paid to the EU as an exit fee, as a part of Brexit. He wonders to himself why he was asked to wear an aqualung while guarding the gold, something he has not done. Suddenly, Eggsy is attacked by a group of stereotypical Frenchmen, who turn out to be members of the "Union Jacks"; the group's muscle, Dave, explains that they pretended to be French so that France would be blamed for when they stole the gold. However, the "gold" turns out to be fake, containing a bomb which destroys the tunnel. Eggsy escapes using the aqualung, discovering that the plan was for the Union Jacks to attempt to steal the gold and be wiped out, and for the EU to be convinced that their owed exit fee was trapped at the bottom of the English Channel, allowing Britain to keep the gold. Eggsy asks his one-eyed superior to drop him off in Peckham.

Orphaned non-free image File:True-Laurie-Strode.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:True-Laurie-Strode.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Blade Runner logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Blade Runner logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:22, 11 October 2018 (UTC)