Rowan-earth
| This is Rowan-earth's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Edelman Fossil Park has been accepted edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 23:50, 24 February 2022 (UTC)February 2022 edit
Hello, I'm Synoman Barris. I noticed that in this edit to Edelman Fossil Park, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Megan B.... It’s all coming to me till the end of time 20:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Edelman Fossil Park edit
Hi, I wanted to give you a somewhat more human explanation than the templates you've been getting. This is probably not something that you realized when creating the Fossil Park article, but there's no such thing as ownership of articles on Wikipedia. Not by the original editor of an article and certainly not by the subject of an article. Once it's been created it's basically "owned" equally by all editors and we would only delete the article if it failed to meet notability standards, was based entirely on copyrighted material, seemed purely promotional, or something else like that. Thankfully, you seem to have made quite a good article with good sourcing. So, if there's things you want to now improve, there's two avenues. If it's very small, fact-based corrections you want to make, then you can generally just do those edits yourself. Anything more substantive and you would need to create an edit request on the talk page. I realize it's a weird situation to have to make requests to change an article you created, but that's how it goes with COI cases. If the changes you want have the same quality sources backing them up that you've used so far, I think you'll find it easy to get your modifications taken care of. I'll watch the page to help out if I can. Hopefully you don't feel too discouraged, as you seem like a good editor. -- Fyrael (talk) 07:37, 26 February 2022 (UTC)