Rough Melody

Welcome

Hello, Rough Melody! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 23:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC) Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Re from my talk

Howdy, since you apparently added the blog, I removed it as under WP:ELNO#Links normally to be avoided under Criteria number 11. You may re-add it if you can show on on Talk:Inception (film) that it does not meet the criteria of #11 The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 23:40, 17 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi, thank you for the welcome message! Personally, I won't add something twice so, I won't add the link again on my own but let me write just a few words why I put that link. I added the link to the article more in a way to provide a further reading article and I read the guideline for Further reading section. Maybe a Further reading section should also comply with the rules for External links section but I still haven't read all the guidelines for all the various topics. In general, my idea was that there were already links on possible interpretations of the ending in the Further reading section of the Inception Wikipedia article but this particular interpretation was not listed on any of the included sources. So, having in mind that "the section should present a balance of various points of view", I decided to include this interpretation. On the other hand, I didn't manage to find it on a more notable location (I had gone through about 50 sites with writings about Inception ending interpetations) thus, I couldn't choose a more notable source to include. It was said on some of the Wikipedia guideline pages that the best approach for editing is to use common sense in the first place, and in this case I decided it was ok to include that link. I thought that non-notablity of the blog in this case did not spoil the content of the article rahter than adding some (maybe not enormous) further reading value to it. It was not written in the guidelines for Further reading section that notability of the source is mandatory and apart from that my intuitive feeling for a "further reading" section was also in the same vein. So, basically that was my idea. Sorry, that it became more than a few words. Rough Melody (talk) 16:06, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Russian Roulette (Triumvirat album)

The article Russian Roulette (Triumvirat album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not satisfy WP:NALBUM. Has been in CAT:NN for over eleven years, hence the PROD.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – DarkGlow • 20:18, 17 August 2021 (UTC)