June 2016 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at British Isles.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Please stop inserting your personal views on geography. Such edits are considered disruptive, and editors who persist in using Wikipedia as a platform for nationalist disputes may lose editing privileges. Acroterion (talk) 17:31, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

  This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to British Isles. Frenzie23 (talk) 17:56, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of William Neilson (Presbyterian minister) edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on William Neilson (Presbyterian minister) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.irishidentity.com/extras/gaels/stories/pulpit.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:49, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please read and follow the instructions above. Deb (talk) 11:58, 21 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Minor edits edit

Please do not mark edits such as this one this one "minor"; they are not. RivertorchFIREWATER 23:41, 15 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

January 2021 edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Owen Roe O'Neill, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.

Hello. Please try to avoid making edits that can be regarded as disruptive and violating WP:NPOV on Wikipedia, especially when you use highly subjective and biased edit summaries such as "O'Neill is a colonised form of the original surname Ó Néill. referring to Irish people by their colonised titles continues the colonisation despite their abscence for a 100 years". There is nothing colonising about it, it is simply the English form of the name, which is used by far more people in Ireland today than the Irish form.

Your edits also broke many links, which had to be fixed.

For the guidelines on names of people please see Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Ireland-related_articles#Irish-language_conventions.

Have a good day.

Mabuska (talk) 15:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC) Mabuska (talk) 15:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)Reply