Welcome! edit

Hello, RoshanSamuelAmbler, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! SwisterTwister talk 18:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dhundh Lenge Manjil Hum for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dhundh Lenge Manjil Hum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dhundh Lenge Manjil Hum until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 11:12, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Longhair. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User:RoshanSamuelAmbler have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Longhair\talk 17:28, 10 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Sorav jain edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sorav jain, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cabayi (talk) 19:08, 10 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Currae Hospital for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Currae Hospital is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Currae Hospital until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cabayi (talk) 19:30, 10 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest edit

  Hello, RoshanSamuelAmbler. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

Your LinkedIn profile states that you edit Wikipedia for clients. Please disclose which articles you have been paid to edit. Cabayi (talk) 09:51, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

November 2018 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Longhair\talk 10:04, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

RoshanSamuelAmbler (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello all, I had initially joined WikiPedia to understand how the platform works and how I can my insights here. There was no intention to violates the policy or guidelines. I see the main issue was the writing style I used earlier was sounding more promotional but that was never intentional. I assure you that I haven't been communicated or paid for any of the page edits done by my end. I assure you that I had been working on my writing styles and gaining knowledge in multiple fields and will try best to provide genuine data to the community. I request for my account to be unblocked. RoshanSamuelAmbler (talk) 11:45, 24 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You wrote on your now-deleted userpage that you are a digital marketer, but you say that you are not paid for your edits. You will have to convince us that either you were not editing about clients previously, or that you will not in the future. Please review WP:COI and WP:PAID. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:15, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

RoshanSamuelAmbler (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

User:331dot Yes, I agreed I was an aspiring digital marketer back then. But rest rest assured I haven't got paid or asked for any payments for any of my edits. I'm confident enough to commitment that we can verify these facts from the admins/point of accounts of edits. 1) Page one - Dhundh Lenge Manjil Hum: This was an hindi movie which I had watched back in 2014 and when I checked it was requiring facts checking on WiKipedia page. hence, added the citations for the page. 2) Page two - Sorav jain: This is an well-known digital marketing influencer from India similar to Neil Patel. hence, tried to add citations from all relevant sources for the page. Page three - Currae Hospital: This is a hospital nearby to my home, which had visited for my Mom's knee surgery. Rest assured these are not my clients and I won't be using WikiPedia platform for spamming or advertising. Initially, I was scared I didn't knew how to react and respond to block queries. hence, getting back to it now. RoshanSamuelAmbler (talk) 08:42, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Accept reason:

I am unblocking you under the condition that you now understand Wikipedia's policies regarding WP:advertising and WP:self-promotion. Please, do not make any more promotional pages, otherwise you will be blocked again. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:37, 25 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please place new posts at the bottom, for proper flow. Someone else will review your request. 331dot (talk) 09:31, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply