RoseAliceD

Welcome!

Hi RoseAliceD! I noticed your contributions to Bastet and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Tacyarg (talk) 19:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Ibogaine. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Zefr (talk) 01:38, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

Where did I promote anything> I was experimenting with editing and found some mistakes RoseAliceD (talk) 02:03, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

I don't see it as anything but the truth Google ibogaine and you'll learn what I'm talking about. The concerns are just that because in a total of eighteen years, 19 people who didn't know the counterindications, who might well of died of opiate addiction otherwise. I suggest you research the topic and decide if that's objective (it's very objective). RoseAliceD (talk) 02:06, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

It doesn't make sense that you edited it back to the erroneous information that were on there originally. Just Google it! The place I cited is the first site on Google's list 🙄 RoseAliceD (talk) 02:09, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

WP:RS sourcing is not about finding Google hits. When addressing medical content, a WP:MEDSCI review is needed for the encyclopedia. Also, sources must be current within the past 5 years, WP:MEDDATE. Most of the article's sources are outdated. Zefr (talk) 03:40, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

I don't know what "finding Google hits" even means, and I know quite a bit about research. I think you have a personal bias and will find some fault in anything I do because of that bias. I would like to be wrong. Please provide me with a list of things you want, so that I can get the real information to people reading Wikipedia, that you won't edit back. If you are a non-biased editor, you will do that for me. I look forward to seeing it.

Sincerely,

Rose RoseAliceD (talk) 01:51, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Ibogaine, you may be blocked from editing. Please adhere to neutral content sourced by WP:RS and WP:MEDRS. This article is not a forum, WP:NOTFORUM. Zefr (talk) 03:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

The problem is that you are viewing objective facts as "commentary and personal analysis" You are processing these facts that way and I wish that would change. I'm not interested in fighting with you and I would like you to do some research of your own because times are changing, with or without certain Wikipedia editors on board. RoseAliceD (talk) 01:25, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

I rewrote the legal section with better sources. See what you think. Zefr (talk) 02:40, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Entheogenic Research, Integration, and Education (ERIE) (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Entheogenic Research, Integration, and Education (ERIE) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 19:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, RoseAliceD! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:08, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Entheogenic Research, Integration, and Education (ERIE) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Entheogenic Research, Integration, and Education (ERIE). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:09, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Wikipedia:Teahouse#I've found a suspicious "volunteer" article reviewer and want to know what to do.. Thank you. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 08:47, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Ok. Could you please look at Safari Scribe's talk page and in good faith, evaluate whether or not it looks suspicious that someone who isn't fluent in English is taking on enough extra reviews that someone else commented that it was suspicious? RoseAliceD (talk) 13:56, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

SafariScribe is an experienced reviewer and your draft was properly declined. You still need to reply to the query about you having a personal connection to the subject of your draft. David notMD (talk) 14:01, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

@RoseAliceD your interaction on the Wikipedia live help earlier today was inappropriate, and you made several baseless accusations against SafariScribe and Cullen328. Do not do that again. Qcne (talk) 15:42, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Didn't you see what Cullen said to me? Well I am not going to look at any more of the ridiculous comments from people who refuse to look at things objectively. It's your loss that you didn't take my advice and I wonder how many more Safari Scribes are out there, with people violently defending them. Don't bother replying and repeating yourself again. I tried to help Wikipedia and this is how I'm treated, forever on record. ;) RoseAliceD (talk) 15:48, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Cullen said NOTHING to you which any other well-standing Wikipedian wouldn't have said. If you have a further complaint about Cullen or indeed Safari Scribe, you will have a cite a specific grievance with a link, at the ANI thread. - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 16:33, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- D'n'B-t -- 16:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 16:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC)