Your recent edits

edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 03:39, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, RollingWave. You have new messages at Sumsum2010's talk page.
Message added 02:41, 22 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, RollingWave. You have new messages at Sumsum2010's talk page.
Message added 15:10, 22 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

You have continually made the article

edit

longer than it has to be. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an all-encompassing comprehensive source. Add to that, removal of English sources in place of Chinese ones makes me think you're 'playing' scholar. I'm actually going to make a conscious effort to shorten the article if you don't mind. Akkies (talk) 03:12, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sigh, for a article that have been attacked from all sides for the lack of sources / objectivity, or using English sources with obviously biased western authors (see Swope and Turnbull, not to meantion a lot of the old sources were directly from Korean websites.) . the LAST thing you expect on actually putting in first hand sources and generally clearing up the article design is to be accused as being "playing scholar" . sure, lets just keep quoting the agenda driven Swope / Turnbull and/or some of the Korean / Japanese websites that may or may not have been written by people with obviously nationalistic agenda instead of the stuff actually written in the late 16th early 17th century.

(RollingWave (talk) 02:50, 28 August 2010 (UTC))Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Engineered stone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aggregates. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

September 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Engineered stone may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • marble_stone_process.jpg|thumb|Demonstration of the Engineered stone manufacturing process (based on the Breton Marble block system, sources courtesy of *[http://www.romastone.com.tw/

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Agglomerated marble stone process.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Agglomerated marble stone process.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:03, 25 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

File:Breton Machine.jpg listed for deletion

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Breton Machine.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 02:27, 26 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Siege of Miki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mori Clan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 15 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply