Welcome! edit

Hello, Rollanotherblunt, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking   if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Masssly —Sadat (Masssly)TalkCEmail 14:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Sadat (Masssly)TalkCEmail 14:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

June 2014 edit

  Hello, I'm Antiochus the Great. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Potential Superpowers, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Antiochus the Great (talk) 16:54, 13 June 2014 (UTC)Reply


I wanted to know you know that you didn't do anything wrong on the potential superpowers article. You are being picked on by anti Russian editors as Antiochus the Great is anti Russian. He wants the "superpowers" and "potential superpowers" his way. So please bear in mind he doesn't use reliable sources himself anyway eithe but you are correct, Russia has the worlds largest nuclear aresenal as i support your version.--185.35.164.239 (talk) 09:24, 16 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Potential Superpowers. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Antiochus the Great (talk) 17:44, 13 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, including continuing to add controversial unsourced content to an article, despite being informed that doing so is unacceptable. As you know, a number of other editors have indicated that they disagree with your editing, but you have continued to make the same edits over and over again. Doing that, known as edit warring, is considered highly disruptive. If you disagree with other editors, you are welcome to explain your reasons and try to persuade them, but Wikipedia works by collaboration, not by each individual editor keeping on changing things back to the way they prefer, so that the most stubborn editor eventually gets his or her way. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:57, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Mazda CX-9 and List of countries by Human Development Index, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Thomas.W talk 12:42, 23 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of countries by Human Development Index. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Blogs are NOT reliable sources! Thomas.W talk 08:10, 24 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for July 23 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Audi Q3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crossover. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

SPI edit

  You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rollanotherblunt. Thank you. Pvpoodle (talk) 18:25, 16 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

I support Rollanotherblunts edits avoid from the currupted edits who hate Russia, all they want to do is denounce Russia.--82.199.150.133 (talk) 18:45, 16 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hilarious how yodu use one of your own ip's to post a fake message expressing support for yourself. well the page is protected now, lets see you reveal your named puppets. Pvpoodle (talk) 15:24, 17 August 2014 (UTC)Reply
Hilarious how you use different nicknames to post a fake message expressing support for yourself and clear comments when u have nothing to answer, pvpoodle aka antiochus the great aka neiln. Take the new nickname: butthurtpoodle

August 2014 edit

 

Your recent editing history at Potential superpowers shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN talk to me 14:23, 17 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 17:26, 17 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Rollanotherblunt you did nothing wrong, you were blocked because of anti Russian bullies edit

It seems you have been a victim of anti Russian bullies undoing your edits. There is a group of editors on Wikipedia are purposely aiming to push Russia off the map on Wikipedia on potential and superpowers. You didn't do anything wrong but you were merely volunteering your time to fix the problems with these pages. It is quite sad that Wikipedia cannot be trusted. If you have valid sources, they will be deleted, if you have comments and facts, they will be deleted by these anti Russian bullies. I am 100% American and it is terrible we have to see this stuff. I hope you start another account and try again, thanks for your help.--216.31.10.250 (talk) 20:58, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Map of the countries which can be superpowers.svg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subjective map of countries that the uploader (later blocked per WP:NOTHERE) believes "can be superpowers"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HouseBlastertalk 18:07, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply