Copyright problem: 1st Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment (United States) edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as 1st Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment (United States), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/army/1-5cav.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:1st Battalion, 5th Cavalry Regiment (United States) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! --Martynas Patasius (talk) 22:41, 7 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

By the way, it looks like you considered the text in question to be in public domain as written by someone from US Army, however, it looks like Globalsecurity.org is not a part of US Army... --Martynas Patasius (talk) 22:41, 7 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

 Template:PD-USGov-Military-Army/layout has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:59, 24 December 2011 (UTC)Reply