User talk:Rogerd/Archive012
- Archive 1 -- 9 Mar 2005 thru 31 Jul 2005
- Archive 2 -- 1 Aug 2005 thru 22 Dec 2005
- Archive 3 -- 23 Dec 2005 thru 15 Mar 2006
- Archive 4 -- 16 Mar 2006 thru 1 Jun 2006
- Archive 5 -- 2 Jun 2006 thru 6 Oct 2006
- Archive 6 -- 6 Oct 2006 thru 25 Jan 2007
- Archive 7 -- 30 Jan 2007 thru 17 May 2007
- Archive 8 -- 27 May 2007 thru 15 Dec 2007
- Archive 9 -- 23 Dec 2007 thru 31 Dec 2008
- Archive 10 -- 1 Jan 2009 thru 2 Jan 2010
- Archive 11 -- 8 Jan 2010 thru 22 Feb 2014
- Archive 12 -- 11 Mar 2014 thru 16 April 2017
- Archive 13 -- 19 May 2017 thru 25 May 2019
- Archive 14 -- 31 May 2019 thru 3 July 2023
- Special Archive - RfA related discussions
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Help with Chuck Yeager article
I found your name on the Military History project page. Trying to clarify whether Chuck Yeager ever got promoted to Maj Gen (ret) in 2005 or at any other time. There are a number of news reports that describe him in passing as a retired Major General, but they could have gotten that info from old versions of Wikipedia. I've found where Congress authorized the president to promote him to Maj Gen (Ronald W. Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005, 108th Congress [1]), but I don't know whether the president/military command ever actually made the promotion. I'm assuming that if he had, there would be a press release or statement from the president's office somewhere. Dezastru (talk) 21:35, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- I don't think that it ever was completed. I searched for this also over a year ago and found about the same thing you did. I just found a reference to an online petition [2] from last August that apparently died on the vine. On his web site, Gen Yeager makes no reference to it. I would say that this particular initiative is stalled. --rogerd (talk) 05:11, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Can you PP an article please?
Hi Rogerd. Could you page protect 2010–11 Georgia Bulldogs basketball team so that IPs are no longer allowed to edit it? A long while back I removed a section called "Quality of officials" because it's clearly WP:UNDUE weight on a very biased facet of that season. At the time I removed it, I had no idea that another editor had already tried removing it several times, but some stupid anon with an agenda keeps re-inserting it. The section violates UNDUE, NPOV, and certainly doesn't belong in the article. This IP has been warned several times ([3][4][5]) about his editing behavior, and that last diff is a final warning. Even after the final warning, he reverted me again. I am probably in the middle of an edit war so I don't want to continue this nonsense with the IP, but he's clearly got an agenda to let the world know his beloved Georgia Bulldogs were apparently screwed in 2010–11 because of referees. Please page protect this, indefinitely if you don't mind, so that only registered editors can edit it. It's tiresome to keep seeing notifications that my legitimate removal has been reverted by a disgruntled Georgia fan or player (for the record, I have no affiliation with Georgia nor with any of its rival schools, I'm merely a college basketball editor who is tired of fighting this uphill battle against a pathetic IP). Thanks! Jrcla2 (talk) 13:07, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- I have semi-protected it against unconfirmed users for 3 months and also added pending changes indefinably --rogerd (talk) 23:54, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dave Garroway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford Falcon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you for your RfA support
Hi there, a bit of a form letter from me, Cyphoidbomb, but I wanted to drop you a line and thank you for your support at my recent RfA. Although I was not successful, I certainly learned quite a bit both about the RfA process and about how the community views my contributions. It was an eye-opener, to say the least. Thank you! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 00:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
En dashes
Seasons that span two seasons, like 1971–72 Kentucky Wildcats men's basketball team, use en dashes, not hyphens. Categories use en dashes as well. Jrcla2 (talk) 17:05, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Request for comment
Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ron Pinkard, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
Sorry!!
I feel like such an idiot about the Harry Lancaster thing, I saw the "r" usernames and somehow my brain decided it was the same editor posting stuff for me to start the article. The thread of comments makes a lot more sense now! I'm really, really sorry about that, I didn't mean to step on your toes and take the article away from you. Kithira (talk) 23:09, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Minton-Capehart Federal Building, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Federal building. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Template:Southeastern Conference university president navbox has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Eustress 19:30, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
Roger, as a follow-up to the previous discussion you started on my user talk page, I have nominated seven navboxes regarding student media organized by university athletic conference for deletion. As this is a subject in which you have have previously expressed an ongoing interest, you are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Regards, Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:13, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Roger, please note that I also started a separate TfD discussion for the constituent academic colleges and schools of the university-members of the athletic conferences, too: the templates' entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:44, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
- Roger, I also started a separate third TfD discussion for the Ivy League business, law and medical school navboxes: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 March 2#Template:ivy League business school navbox. I separated these three from the rest of the herd because (a) they do have stand-alone list articles supporting the navbox topics, and (b) sometimes the media does refer to Ivy League law schools, etc. I didn't want these three to confuse the discussions for the other 22 navboxes naominated. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 20:09, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Roger, here's one we missed: Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 June 12#Template:Southeastern Conference Law Schools. Given your past interest in related navbox subjects, I thought you would want to know. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 04:49, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
To You and Yours!
Wishing you all the best . . .
Merry Christmas, Roger, and may your holidays be merry and bright . . . . Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:24, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Rogerd!
.jpg)
Rogerd,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:48, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
- Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to send this message
Happy New Year, Rogerd!
Rogerd,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz Read! Talk! 21:05, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
- Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Disambiguation link notification for June 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nick Mingione, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Cohen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)
Extended confirmed protection
Hello, Rogerd. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.
Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.
In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:
- Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
- A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.
Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:49, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,
Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi Rogerd.
A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.
It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.
If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Rogerd. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Mike Pence
Howdy. Why would you delete that he was the 50th Governor of Indiana, when he was? GoodDay (talk) 04:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.
Administrator changes
NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13
Guideline and policy news
- A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
- Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
- Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.
Technical news
- When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
- Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
- The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.
Arbitration
- The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.
Obituaries
- JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.
13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
1980 Hawaii Rainbow Warriors baseball team
Hey, just want to let you know for WP:College baseball, I'm going to create a season article for the 1980 Hawaii team. Right now, I'm working on it in draft space at Draft:1980 Hawaii Rainbow Warriors baseball team. Quidster4040 (talk) 19:41, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
March Madness 2017
G'day all, please be advised that throughout March 2017 the Military history Wikiproject is running its March Madness drive. This is a backlog drive that is focused on several key areas:
- tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
- updating the project's currently listed A-class articles to ensure their ongoing compliance with the listed criteria
- creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various task force pages or other lists of missing articles.
As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.
The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the military history scope will be considered eligible. More information can be found here for those that are interested, and members can sign up as participants at that page also.
The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 March and runs until 23:59 UTC on 31 March 2017, so please sign up now.
For the Milhist co-ordinators. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) & MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Hal Baylor
Hi. I noticed you just created Hal Baylor. I don't see a good reason why you'd do this. First, it's questionable if he passes WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. There's a good chance I could have this deleted through AfD. Second, you cited only one source, IMDb, which you should know is crowd-sourced and not reliable. Finally, such a weak stub makes me question why you bothered creating it. 50-100 years from now there might be more written about the subject but you just robbed that future editor of a four award. I know you think you're helping but the fact is, you're not. I think it would be best if you just delete that article. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:29, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- Well, I am not done yet. --rogerd (talk) 18:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- I am not reassured. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:56, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- Just because most of his film credits were before you or I were born, doesn't make him not notable. The man had a long career in a lot of supporting roles. --rogerd (talk) 19:00, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- Please note that I've already stated
"it's questionable if he passes WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG"
. I didn't make an argument about when he appeared in films, or what genre he performed in, or where he was from. Long careers do not notability make. I judge articles based on our objective criteria. You should do the same. I really dislike admins being bad examples to other editors. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:53, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- Please note that I've already stated
- Just because most of his film credits were before you or I were born, doesn't make him not notable. The man had a long career in a lot of supporting roles. --rogerd (talk) 19:00, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- I am not reassured. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:56, 16 April 2017 (UTC)