Hello Roger,
and first of all, thanks for your contributions. It didn't feel good to delete such a large contribution from the said article (Federal enclaves) earlier. I am happy to learn that you have found the inspiration to re-edit this text. While I have not had time to review your contributions yet, superficially looking the article looks now something that could be made to working order. I will now read the article from start to end and make a "copyedit" where I'll try to do my best render the article in line with the finer parts of the Wikipedia manual of style. Thank you, --hydrox (talk) 23:50, 2 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello again. I have enhanced the article by e.g. a) adding wikilinks; b) unifying some references; c) making the sectioning more hierarchial; d) shortening some heading titles; e) harmonizing the use of certain terms like state/State and having all case law examples in article text in italics; f) and most importantly, by extracting the few most important points to the lead section.
Can you please go over the article once more and see if I made any mistakes. I am by no means an expert in US law (nor subject to it).
All in all I think the addition is very valuable review of the history of federal enclaves, and I am happy to see it incorporate so well at last! --hydrox (talk) 03:21, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 04:37, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply