User talk:Rodolph/Archive2

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Edmund Boyle, 8th Earl of Cork may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ], Devon, and Trethurfe, Cornwall, distant scion of [[John Courtenay (of Tremere)]] (Tremeer)). Meanwhile, Lord Cork's younger brother, [[Courtenay Boyle|Vice-Admiral Sir Courtenay Boyle]] (

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:44, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to George Pearson (doctor) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• a butcher. George Smith is associated with property in [[Wortley, South Yorkshire|]Wortley]]; [[Tankersley, South Yorkshire|Tankersley]]; and Mortomley High Green, [[Ecclesfield]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:03, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John George Dodson, 1st Baron Monk Bretton may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• of William John Campion of [[Danny House|Danny]], [[Hurstpierpoint]], [[Sussex]], by Harriet Kemp (daughter of [[Thomas Read Kemp]] in 1856. They had one son and three daughters. They lived at 6,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:14, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Dodson (judge) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ODNB]]<ref>The History of Parliament: the House of Commons 1660-1690, ed. B.D. Henning, 1983</ref>)).
• of Robert Shaw, vintner, of St. George’s, Southwark, Surrey <ref>1634 Visitation of London</ref>), and brother of [[Sir John Shaw, 1st Baronet|Sir John Shaw, Bt.,]] of Broad street, London and

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:56, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited William Stephen Poyntz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bognor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Dawley Court, Middlesex in 1929.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dawley Court, Middlesex in 1929.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:08, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

thanks. I don't understand why it is not ok, it was taken in 1929, and as author is unknown thus it is well out of copyright?Rodolph (talk) 01:12, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Dawley Court, Middlesex in 1929.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Dawley Court, Middlesex in 1929.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Stifle (talk) 15:06, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

photo which is in my possession was taken in 1929, by anonymous.Rodolph (talk) 16:39, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

I quote from Wikipedia: Under UK law then assuming continued lack of ownership then they will be copyright until 2063 (publication plus 70 years). Nthep (talk) 20:28, 12 January 2014 (UTC), ergo this photograph has been ok since 1999... 14 or 15 years ago.Rodolph (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for January 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George Pearson (doctor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Staunton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Alfred Hitchens pastel harvest scene.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alfred Hitchens pastel harvest scene.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:58, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

thanks for notification. The artist died in 1942; ergo 72 years ago, thus image copyright free? Rodolph (talk) 19:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

This was removed by VANDALS. I will apply for a fair use. Please help me to do this, otherwise a great image will be lost forever.Rodolph (talk) 01:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

de:Datei:Salis shield Altes Gebau Coire.jpg

Hey Rodolph, I found this photo on the German Wikipedia. It lacks the sufficient copyright information, so my question: Have you taken this photo? If so, can we move it to Commons in order that en.wp and de.wp don't need separate lokal copies? Thanks in advance, Yellowcard (talk) 15:04, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

yes, I took the photograph, (in 2006?). Thanks for asking.Rodolph (talk) 19:42, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Common Buzzard may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• UK, 1 March 2014.jpg|thumbnail|Buteo buteo, Common buzzard, from north-west Hampshire, UK. (March 1st, 2014.]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:55, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Edmund Waller may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• early Virginia affairs. See [[Benjamin Waller]], [[Littleton Waller Tazewell]] and [[Edwin Waller]]).{{sfn|Crozier|1908|p=37}}
• the life and writings of Edmund Waller'', printed for [[Jacob Tonson]], in the Strand, 1722</ref>) of [[Thame]] or possibly of somewhere in France, and went over to Calais, afterwards taking up his

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:38, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Treaty of Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Struthers (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

unneccessary and unkind deletion

very sorry, I see now your Talk page. I'm sorry, I was so extremely upset at the removal of an ok image. It was'nt you, so I'm extra sorry, though you did assign it its death warrant. Alfred Hitchens died in 1942, (and the picture was done pre- 1923), that is over 70 years ago, so image is ok for the UK. I will put it back up but avoid USA?Rodolph (talk) 02:18, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

I've copied this message for Stefan2 onto his talk page. We hope (talk) 02:27, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Rodolph. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 16:42, 12 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2 (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Rodolph. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 23:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Stefan2 (talk) 23:53, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Curling, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Harvey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Brympton D'Evercy

I am a little surprised that this image of '1860' was found in an album owned by William Andrew Salius Fane de Salis described as a 'Fane cousin.' Not only because William Andrew Salius Fane de Salis Fane's link to the Fane/Westmorland family then owning Brympton was extremely distant and tenuous, but also because the eccentric Lady Georgiana Fane was living in seclusion at Brympton and was estranged from her Fane relations. I wonder of you know anything more about it? I also note that, other than Wikipedia, members of the Fane de Salis family seem to appear only on amamteur genealogical websites. I believed that I knew of most members of the Brympton and Westmorland Fane family, this branch appear to be less well documented. Giano (talk) 17:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

thanks for asking. Sure, is in his album, same album has a photo of quite nearby Wilton. William Fane de Salis & his wife's sometime residence at Teffont Evias was only 35 miles away from Brympton. William's wife, Emily, her father J. T. Mayne may have known Brympton. Or else the photos could have been taken by a third party. William was as keen on the past as the future, in that a successful business man he was also something of an appreciator of history and archives. Though albeit only a 6th cousin of the main line of Fanes, his younger brother's wife's mother was a Fane of Wormsley, so circa 3rd cousin of those Brympton d'Evercy crowd. (Vide 'De Salis' in foreign titles sections of the Burke's & Debrett's Peerages, and in Burke's Irish Family Records, and 'Fane de Salis' in Burke's Landed Gentry. See 'Viscount Fane' in the G.E.C.'s Complete Peerage, etc).Rodolph (talk) 20:18, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Count de Salis-Soglio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to De Salis

John Bernard Philip Humbert, 9th Count de Salis-Soglio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to HAC

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Eugène, 8th Count de Salis-Soglio may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• (She married secondly, London, 10.7.1950, Lt. Colonel Rudolf Albert Freiherr v. Salis-Jenins-
• [[Category:Counts of Salis|

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:36, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Count de Salis-Soglio may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• and disambiguation page [[De Salis]], there are others within the purlieu of the 1748 creation). </sub>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:27, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Count de Salis-Seewis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Karlstadt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Daily Telegraph cutting, February 2014, Peter Drummond-Murray, news re Bailiff of SMOM.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Daily Telegraph cutting, February 2014, Peter Drummond-Murray, news re Bailiff of SMOM.jpg, which you've attributed to D. Telegraph. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:30, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Dalling Cabinets, Anglo-Indian Vizagaptam ivory bureau cabinets, circa 1786, on ebonised and parcel gilt stands, c1810.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dalling Cabinets, Anglo-Indian Vizagaptam ivory bureau cabinets, circa 1786, on ebonised and parcel gilt stands, c1810.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 02:29, 30 April 2014 (UTC)