Helpful links edit

If you need help, check out Getting Help below, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Snowman (talk) 17:57, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Digital recreations of macaws edit

Re: File:Glaucous macaw.jpg: I think this image is interesting and that you are good at manipulation of digital images. I have started a discussion about the images at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Birds and you would be welcome to participate and advance the discussion over there. I guess that there are probably many ways which you could contribute to the Wiki using your talents with images, and the best way might be to participate with a WikiProject; such as WikiProject Birds. Can you make digital maps? Snowman (talk) 17:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Rod6807, you are invited to the Teahouse edit

 

Hi Rod6807! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Castel Sant'Angelo edit

Hi there! I've removed your image File:Chateau-st-ange.jpg from the article on Castel Sant'Angelo, and from the three articles on es.wikipedia where you had inserted it. It is a fine and interesting image, but unfortunately as it stands it is considered WP:original research - it's your personal idea of what that building might have looked like. If your reconstruction is based on published WP:reliable sources, then perhaps those should be mentioned in the description of the image. If it has been published by some reliable source, then citing that source would give the image credibility. As mentioned above, I am sure that your talents could be put to good use in wikipedia, and joining up with other editors might be a good way to make that happen. Best wishes, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Photo manipulations edit

Hi, it would be good if you listed the source photos you use for your photo manipulations, to make sure they are not copyright violations. For example the background here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pezophaps_solitaria_recreation.jpg FunkMonk (talk) 23:19, 17 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Many thanks for your advice. In any case, I noticed that photo manipulations of Pezophaps and Ara tricolor are now unrealistic and need deletion. I will proceed according to do so. No copyright violations are involved in the other images I have uploaded: the unpublished sources are mine or from friends who have sent them to me for such manipulations.