You are still doing it edit

Please read WP:BURDEN - your reinstatement of content here is still insufficient and in fact advances the situation barely at all. Please also note that while it is ok to clear your talk page as you have done, this is seen as being an acknowledgement that you have read the messages that were removed. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 09:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

ANI edit

  Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - Sitush (talk) 18:07, 14 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

September 2013 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for apparent incompetence (esp. addition of unverified content) combined with complete lack of communication with other editors. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Drmies (talk) 04:17, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kayadu for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kayadu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kayadu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sitush (talk) 10:22, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sock edit

I've worked it out, at last. You are a sockpuppet of Buddhakahika, aren't you? Stop it, please - I'm going to have to revert/delete everything that you have done. - Sitush (talk) 05:10, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Modern Hindu war cries for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Modern Hindu war cries is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modern Hindu war cries until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Drmies (talk) 14:02, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet investigation edit

 

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rockin It Loud, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 01:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Reply