Oklahoma State cowboys football edits

edit

No such consensus was reached, as several users that took part in said discussion have been blocked for being sockpuppets of the same banned user. Feel free to start a discussion on the talk page. Dcheagletalkcontribs 00:48, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

From what I can tell, @PK-WIKI made an opinion that was relatively agreed upon by everyone. You continually going against everyone to push an edit only you agree about is not what wikipedia is about. You also deleted relevant information for seemingly no reason other than personal opinion. Rockeez (talk) 00:52, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
After looking at it, you (who have been caught using socks in the past) and Jeff In CA are the only ones who have an issue with the section. Compared to at least 4 users who support it, including @PK-WIKI. Please refrain from deleting information simply because you disagree with it, it’s an encyclopedia, not an opinion article. Rockeez (talk) 01:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Oklahoma State Cowboys football, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. No such consensus was come too as multiple users taking part in the discussion were blocked for being sock puppets of the same master sock. Dcheagletalkcontribs 01:10, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

You really sent me this after you made edits that removed TONS of information? Are you serious? Rockeez (talk) 01:13, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Not a single person except for you agrees with your edits. Your refusal to counter my arguments is making it blatantly obvious who is in the right, and who’s not. Rockeez (talk) 01:18, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Suspected Sockpupetry

edit

  You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DylanPuma20. Thank you. Dcheagletalkcontribs 01:33, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:DylanPuma20 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/DylanPuma20. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Izno (talk) 02:10, 1 October 2024 (UTC)Reply