Roadnote
|
♫ Roadnote
.png)
♫ Userboxes
|
This user lives in Northern Ireland. |
|
This user lives in Ireland. |
|
This user lives in the United Kingdom. |
.svg){kind=small}
|
This user lives in Europe. |
|
This user lives in the World. |
|
This user lives in the Solar System. |
♫ Motto o' the day
Today's motto...
There is no such thing as a Civil War
Welcome
edit
|
Ireland as island article
editHi. I saw your vote at Ireland, and not having seen you around, had a look at you pages. It's interesting to me that you are clearly very into Northern Ireland articles, yet find Ireland the best name to describe the island. I've always found that the confusions with the Ireland article (having state/island content and being linked as both state and island) has hindered Northern Ireland articles - sometimes to the point of making Ireland seem like a single unified state. Have you experienced that? I collected some problems in here (just the tip of the iceberg too). I would prefer to have both states offered by a disam page, and have a geographical-only 'Ireland (island)' article.--Matt Lewis (talk) 16:53, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- Hi Matt, been about a while, only recently got up the nerves to enter into an Ireland-related discussion! Personally I feel the solution to the links problem is to fix the links themselves - province to province, state to state, island to island.
- I don't believe there is anything gained from a disambiguation page that isn't already catered for on the very first line (This article is about the island. For the cou...) and in the introduction of the Ireland article.. Hope this clarifies my thoughts on the Ireland page. As you have very clearly pointed out the "..of Ireland"s, "...of Northern Ireland"s and "...of the Republic of Ireland"s all really need cleaned-up. Roadnote ♫ 01:47, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying that. How would you feel if the hatnote you mentioned was made even clearer (I find it a bit hidden myself). Also - would it be OK to remove the 'forked' cultural and political information from the island article (so it's geographical only, like it's meant to be)? See Great Britain for an example of what it would be like. I agree that if we needed to do link-clearing work, all the articles need working on anyway. --Matt Lewis (talk) 02:34, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- I wouldn't have a problem with making the top bit clearer as to the contents of the article. Taking out the cultural and polical stuff is difficult. Ireland isn't like Great Britain where there are two/three distinct geo-political units. There are all-Ireland political and cultural institutions which operate irrespective of the border: Presbyterian Church, GAA, Irish Rugby, Foras na Gaeilge, Tha Boord o Ulstèr-Scotch etc. The GB institutions are generally UK-wide and so are discussed in United Kingdom, leaving Great Britain as an entirely geographical article. Roadnote ♫ 13:19, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for clarifying that. How would you feel if the hatnote you mentioned was made even clearer (I find it a bit hidden myself). Also - would it be OK to remove the 'forked' cultural and political information from the island article (so it's geographical only, like it's meant to be)? See Great Britain for an example of what it would be like. I agree that if we needed to do link-clearing work, all the articles need working on anyway. --Matt Lewis (talk) 02:34, 26 November 2008 (UTC)
The colour of Northern Ireland in the map you changed today
editHello, I'm afraid I have reverted the map back to use yellow for Northern Ireland and reverted the changes to the captions you made: the colours were chosen after a discussion on Talk:Subdivisions of the United Kingdom, where it was felt that using green for Northern Ireland was making too political a point. If you feel the colour should be changed, by all means raise it on an appropriate forum (say the Subdivisions article), and see if you have widespread agreement for the change. DDStretch (talk) 17:24, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry about that DDStretch, thanks for letting me know. Roadnote ♫ 19:09, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
- Have a look at Talk:Subdivisions of the United Kingdom again please; I'm requesting design discussion to include green for Ireland just so we can have matching colours on Ireland/Northern-Ireland maps. -- Evertype·✆ 21:51, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:CultureNorthernIrelanddotOrg.png
editThanks for uploading Image:CultureNorthernIrelanddotOrg.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
Ireland naming dispute compromise proposal
editYou may be interested in an all-encompassing compromise proposal tabled in respect of the Ireland naming dispute at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style_(Ireland-related_articles)/Ireland_disambiguation_task_force#Appeal_for_an_all-encompassing_solution Mooretwin (talk) 12:59, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Ireland naming question
editYou are receiving this message because you have previously posted at a Ireland naming related discussion. Per Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Ireland article names#Back-up procedure, a procedure has been developed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Ireland Collaboration, and the project is now taking statements. Before creating or replying to a statement please consider the statement process, the problems and current statements. GnevinAWB (talk) 18:19, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi there, Roadnote! Thought you might be interested in Motto of the Day, a collaborative (and totally voluntary) effort by a group of Wikipedians to create original, inspirational mottos. Have a good motto idea? Share it here, comment on some of the mottos there or just pass this message onto your friends.
MOTD Needs Your Help!
Delivered By –pjoef (talk • contribs) 08:12, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Motto of the Day Help Request April 2014
editMotto of the Day (WP:MOTD) is in a state of emergency and really needs your help! There are not enough editors who are reviewing or nominating mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review, and this probably means that you will notice a red link or “This space for rent” as our mottos for the next weeks and months.
Please take a moment to review the nominations and nominate your own new mottos at Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/In review and Wikipedia:Motto of the day/Nominations/'Specials. Any help would be appreciated! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
- This message has been sent by pjoef on behalf of Motto of the Day to all editors of the English Wikipedia who are showing MOTD's templates on their pages, and to all the participants to MOTD: (page, template, and category).
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Arts Council of Northern Ireland.PNG
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
The article Culture Northern Ireland has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to fail WP:WEB, searching finds no independent coverage by reliable sources. Currently the article is self-sourced by the website 'About Us' page.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gab4gab (talk) 12:16, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Northern-ireland-assembly.png
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:CultureNorthernIrelanddotOrg.png
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:29, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Green-party-northern-ireland.png
edit
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Ireland Labelled Map
edit
Template:Ireland Labelled Map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:38, 19 May 2022 (UTC)