Your submission at Articles for creation: Bunty Rathore (March 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The9Man was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The9Man | (talk) 06:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, RoZTaly! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The9Man | (talk) 06:21, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jayvijay Sachan (March 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Lapablo (talk) 18:45, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jayvijay Sachan (March 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LeoFrank was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 LeoFrank  Talk 17:15, 15 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Bunty Rathore edit

 

The article Bunty Rathore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable writer and actor with no notable work. Lacks in-depth coverage and in my opinion fails WP:GNG an WP:BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - FitIndia Talk Commons 14:46, 19 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Bunty Rathore for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bunty Rathore is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bunty Rathore until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - FitIndia Talk Commons 11:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Seema Samridhi edit

 

The article Seema Samridhi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Coverages are WP:ROUTINE, and WP:NOTNEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KartikeyaS (talk) 16:44, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nivedita Chandel edit

 

The article Nivedita Chandel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS💬 19:20, 20 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Heropanti 2 (2021) moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Heropanti 2 (2021), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Polyamorph (talk) 19:32, 21 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Heropanti 2 (March 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (barksniff) 08:55, 22 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Yuvraj Singh (dancer) for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yuvraj Singh (dancer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yuvraj Singh (dancer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Abishe (talk) 02:43, 23 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Gaurav Taneja moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Gaurav Taneja, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. KartikeyaS (talk) 07:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2020 edit

 

Hello RoZTaly. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Gaurav Taneja, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:RoZTaly. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=RoZTaly|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. KartikeyaS (talk) 07:43, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Mohamed Beiraghdary moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Mohamed Beiraghdary, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. KartikeyaS (talk) 07:55, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Jayvijay Sachan moved to draftspace edit

An article you recently created, Jayvijay Sachan, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. KartikeyaS (talk) 08:02, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Mistake edit

Hello, I write only public figure, celebrity,films articles. I search online about these and write. If did some mistake please help to solve. So that I can make Wikipedia even better. I love to contribute on Wikipedia.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jayvijay Sachan 1 (March 24) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 23:39, 24 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet edit