Your submission at Articles for creation: Axxela (March 30) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Numberguy6 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Numberguy6 (talk) 02:50, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello, I apologize for the late response. Thanks for taking out time to review the article, it's obvious I'm a novice. I have updated the article as advised, please help peruse it if it now meets the verifiable policy and it does not sound like an advertisement. I'm open to further changes based on your feedback and would not mind having a real-time chat for your help as I'm new here.
Thank you. Rnewenergy5 (talk) 13:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Rnewenergy5! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Numberguy6 (talk) 02:50, 30 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

 

Hello Rnewenergy5. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Rnewenergy5. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Rnewenergy5|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 08:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello Theroadislong, thanks for your feedback, I did the first time the article was published, I did not know I'd have to do it again after editing, maybe, I did it wrongly, my apologies; I'm still getting trying to get my head around this.
I have disclosed my employer, client and affiliation on my Rnewenergy5 page as advised, please check if I disclosed it correctly. Do advise if there are other mistakes I need to correct. Thanks for your help. Rnewenergy5 (talk) 08:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
No that is not correct please follow the format above {{paid|user=Rnewenergy5|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Theroadislong (talk) 09:06, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello Theroadislong, thanks for your prompt feedback, I have corrected the disclosure to the format you provided. I appreciate your patience. Rnewenergy5 (talk) 09:16, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Axxela (May 13) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 09:07, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello Theroadislong, thanks for your response and for your time reviewing my article. Just to clarify, is the current issue only with the references I added, and I have to get references that show significant coverage? Rnewenergy5 (talk) 14:24, 18 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your thread has been archived edit

 

Hi Rnewenergy5! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Article declines, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.


See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Axxela (November 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 08:43, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Axxela edit

  Hello, Rnewenergy5. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Axxela, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:26, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply