Rme.ust7

Welcome!

Hi Rme.ust7! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Rme.ust7, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Choosing an article to edit Editing an article • Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:08, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Article Feedback

Lead is good, explains topic at hand what the article will focus on and very concise. Content is very relative and up to date I believe, I don't think we have to worry about underrepresentation here. I do think the content added her is neutral doesn't sway one way or the other. I do not notice any persuasion however, the program he created does seem very cool and can help out a lot of people learn about computer science who before would not have been able to do so. The secondary source is a reliable source! There are only 2 but sometimes less is more when they are very solid sources. Very clear and concise, I changed just a few words to make it less wordy but its great. No images here, could be a good idea to add one of the person of interest. It does have two sources, maybe a 3rd would be nice but I don't think it's necessary. It follows other articles patterns nicely. I added a wiki link to explain more about what Quorum really is. Also, limited the times you said "the program Quorum" say it once and then we know it's a program so just call it Quorum. Strengths are that you talk about his most popular work, it would be nice to learn more about him but some of these people aren't that special and it's hard to find more info. Also, the source the info comes from is a very reliable journal. A few other points of what he does would be nice but like I said sometimes it is hard to come by.

1) This article does a great job of introducing the subject and explaining his biggest achievement. Also, does a great job of explaining why that achievement is so special.

2) I would try to find one or two more things to touch on about this guy but sometimes that is very hard to do with these people. Also, like i said before just a little more concise like not saying the program Quorum every time.

3) I think its just beefing it up a little, probably find one or two more sources of information about him.

4) I think I too could find more info to beef up my article as well as add a few wiki links to other wiki pages to help describe and define certain parts of the article.

(Pfromberger (talk) 21:51, 9 April 2021 (UTC)) Phil

Concern regarding Draft:Andreas Stefik

Hello, Rme.ust7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andreas Stefik, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC)