User talk:Rjwilmsi/Archives/2014/April

Automated errors - don't use more than one of work= and website=

Hi, this edit made by User:RjwilmsiBot introduced an error (according to the template coding anyway). Please fix whatever automated process you're using. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:22, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Now fixed, thanks. Rjwilmsi 18:27, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Mitchell (comedian), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Parkinson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Confusion over author parameters

I just reverted this edit by the bot, where it added author parameters for a non-human 'author' (actually the name of a recurring column). Is there any way to prevent this, or is this just a low-frequency error that's better to manually correct? Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 08:03, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

I have an author name exclusion list, so will add this value to it. Thanks for letting me know. Rjwilmsi 07:18, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! I'll let you know if I see any similar issues. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:27, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Bot created unsupported parameter error

The bot created an unsupported parameter error with this edit. URLs need to use %7c instead of the | character.

Is this bug fixable? I hope so. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:01, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks Rjwilmsi 13:15, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:46, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Bot created redundant parameter error, adding |location= when |place= was already present

The bot created a redundant parameter error with this edit, adding |location= when |place= was already present. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:47, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks Rjwilmsi 07:23, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Bot inserted template into citation template

I'm not sure what happened here, but it doesn't look right. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:24, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

It picked up an invalid value from the news page source. I'll ensure titles starting with {{ are ignored. Rjwilmsi 07:25, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

doi added to flavonoid article

Hi. On the 20th April, you added a doi (doi=10.1616/1476-2137.14184) for the Taylor et al reference in the Flavonoid article. Please be advised that this doi doesn't work. Thanks, 180.180.69.225 (talk) 23:33, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

OK, thanks, it's the DOI specified by crossref though the website it resolves to seems to be down. I've added |doi_inactivedate= to the citation. Rjwilmsi 08:18, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

[1], Hey Rjwilmsi, I had a question, how you discover DOI? OccultZone (Talk) 12:34, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

By searching Crossref.org. Rjwilmsi 12:36, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Question

You do some amazing work around here and if I am not mistaken you even have a bot named after you. Congratulations and thanks for all your work. Just a simple question, and excuse my ignorance: What exactly is a DOI? Thanks, warshy ^(¥¥) 17:51, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. See the article on Digital object identifier. Rjwilmsi 17:52, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks a lot. Be well. warshy ^(¥¥) 18:03, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

P.S.- In my mind, since this morning, I started calling you RJ Wilmsi. :<) warshy ^(¥¥) 18:09, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

OER inquiry

Hi Rjwilmsi/Archives/2014, I'm sending you this message because you're one of about 300 users who have recently edited an article in the umbrella category of open educational resources (OER) (or open education). In evaluating several projects we've been working on (e.g. the WIKISOO course and WikiProject Open), my colleague Pete Forsyth and I have wondered who chooses to edit OER-related articles and why. Regardless of whether you've taken the WIKISOO course yourself - and/or never even heard the term OER before - we'd be extremely grateful for your participation in this brief, anonymous survey before 27 April. No personal data is being collected. If you have any ideas or questions, please get in touch. My talk page awaits. Thanks for your support! - Sara FB (talk) 20:48, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Invitation join the new Physiology Wikiproject!

Physiology gives us an understanding of how and why things in the field of medicine happen. Together, let us jumpstart the project and get it going. Our energy is all it needs.

Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.

• Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
• You can tag the talk pages of relevant articles with {{WikiProject Physiology|class=|importance=}} with your assessment of the article class and importance alongwith. Please note that WP:Physiology, WP:Physio, WP:Phy can be used interchangeably.
• You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing physiology articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
• We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
• Why not try and strive to create a good article! Physiology related articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
• Your contributions to the WikiProject page, related categories and templates is also welcome.
• To invite other editors to this WikiProject, copy and past this template (with the signature):
  • {{subst:WP Physiology–invite}} ~~~~
• To welcome editors of physiology articles, copy and past this template (with the signature):
  • {{subst:WP Physiology–welcome}} ~~~~
• You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.

Hoping for your cooperation! Diptanshu^Talk 12:13, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Doi?

Hey, how do you find the doi for an article? I saw you added one to Pantheism here. I have added a journal ref to Pandeism (and to Problem of evil, same journal as the article was on Pandeism as it addresses the PoE). Can you do this for these as well? Blessings!! DeistCosmos (talk) 20:44, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

I find the DOIs by searching on crossref.org. For those two articles crossref doesn't find any more DOIs, not all journal articles have a DOI assigned. Rjwilmsi 12:25, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Okay then, thank you for checking. DeistCosmos (talk) 18:42, 28 April 2014 (UTC)