User talk:Rjwilmsi/Archives/2010/February
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
DateOfBirth and DateOfDeath fields
Do you think we could modify AWB to obtain info from human categories from Infobox college coach as I did here? Infobox college coach has more than 3,000 tranclusions. -- Magioladitis (talk) 19:55, 1 February 2010 (UTC) ...or we could find a way to change dates in these fields (and other similar ones) in order to use {{birth date and age}} -- Magioladitis (talk) 20:23, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- rev 6145 to allow that casing of date of birth and death field names; criteria for IsArticleAboutAPerson will remain the same. Rjwilmsi 20:28, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- You are great! Thanks! -- Magioladitis (talk) 20:35, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Talk:Lamoille-2 Vermont Representative District, 2002-2012, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Talk:Lamoille-2 Vermont Representative District, 2002-2012 was moved to Talk:Lamoille-2 Vermont Representative District, 2002–2012 by Rjwilmsi (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2010-02-02T12:08:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 12:08, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Ecuador
Hi. I need your assistance. Can you rename all of those sub cats (Except Bolivar) in Category:Provinces of Ecuador which have an unneccessary .,Ecuador on the end to the simple naming. So instead of Category:Manabí Province, Ecuador it would become simply Category:Manabí Province. I and Ser Amantio have tackled a few already but all of the empty categories afterwards which have ,Ecuador on the end need deleting like Category:Azuay Province, Ecuador etc as that has alreayd been done. Once thats done, can you go through the province articles e.g Azuay Province and correct the canton links in the articles from (canton) to Canton. Admittedly I am uncertain as to whether or not they should be capitalized. In fact I think they should probably be ... (canton). If you agree, then leave those links and move all the articles to (canton) instead but be sure to correct the existing links and names in the articles and also the navigation template.
What naming looks right to you Nabón Canton or Nabón (canton). Peronsally I am thinking it would be best to move them to the latter one. Any thoughts?
Also the current naming for the Cantons of Costa Rica is capitalised and for Venezuelan municpalities is .... Municipality too. I think the naming would be better (municipality) for Venezuela too like the Mexican ones... I think Province and District is capitals looks right but not for canton and municipality, any thoughts on this too? ‡ Himalayan ‡ ΨMonastery 11:52, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Franchising
Since you edited a page on franchising and my have an interest on the subject, I invite you to review this page Yellow Van Handyman and participate in the voting process here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yellow Van Handyman. Thanks! USchick (talk) 05:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Ibid
We need Ibid above Reflist and not under it. This is the common practice as I checked. I'll add a note on its manual.
Now my idea on Ibid: Ibid refers to the reference right above. We could obtain this info that create the reference. Of course not in all cases but in some easy cases. For example if "Ibid" is alone then we copy the last reference of name the tags and merge them into one. This will need a lot of tests in the beginning but I think it can work in many cases.
PS I ll probably update this message as soon as I have more feedback
-- Magioladitis (talk) 10:36, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Disagree with ibid fix approach: references could be added to the article in the meantime, meaning ibid does not refer to closest previous reference. I rather think they will require manual fixing from somebody who knows the article. Rjwilmsi 10:39, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Ibid should already be going to top of references section. The article you link to is a bad one given the spurious <references> Rjwilmsi 10:54, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- Ok. I agree with you then :) I'll check the talk header thing later today too. -- Magioladitis (talk) 11:23, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Syria-Lebanon Campaign - clean up deprecated citation parameters using AWB
With this change, you moved an issue number (Vol. 32 No. 7) from the Volume field to the issue field (i.e. |issue=7)however, there already was an issue field (with the date of the magazine (|issue=July 1970), so the issue number went missing - is there any workaround for this? Pehaps putting both the issue number and name in the same issue field?Nigel Ish (talk) 19:12, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
- I updated the article to put the month and year in the
|month=
and|year=
fields respectively. Rjwilmsi 22:51, 14 February 2010 (UTC)
Headers
It works fine. ([1] and tenths more). A little vulnerable to vandalism attacks ([2]. I tried to add header where the vandalism was). -- Magioladitis (talk) 13:37, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- rev 6204 Bugfix – will help for that. Rjwilmsi 13:58, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
- I think it's better to have an empty line before the header and the text to come immediately after the header [3]
- TOC can cause problems: [4]
-- Magioladitis (talk) 13:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
I ran with rev 6217. This and this (it added header inside archive box) shouldn't happen. Any ideas? -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
- rev 6221 Another fix. Rjwilmsi 09:15, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Anthony Watts (blogger), is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- TS 21:23, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Date modification in redirect
Hello, this probably shouldn't happen. Thanks. --Closedmouth (talk) 12:50, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
- Page title was wrong. I've now fixed it. Thanks Rjwilmsi 14:15, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Dida
Hi there! I posted a reply to the introduction template you recently added to the article in the discussion thread. I'm aware the current introduction is puny and it will be expanded soon. sixtynine • spill it • 17:32, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Dead end
{{Dead end}} isn't merged to Article issues, while it should. Any ideas? Example -- Magioladitis (talk) 17:48, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
An article that you have been involved in editing, Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Avicennasis 12:18, 28 February 2010 (UTC)