Rivalnator

Lainie Ross

You marked my page on Lainie Ross for deletion. Please make it a speedy deletion. The person has contacted me asking for it to be removed, as some of the facts are incorrect.

Thanks. Sbchristianlowe April 10, 2014 — Preceding undated comment added 15:36, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

List of e-commerce services in Nepal

Why are you notifying me about a speedy deletion request? I have nothing to do with the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 19:14, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

 Sorry, fixed. Rivalnator (talk) 19:16, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

This is Mosa Dawas speaking.

I request my account to be permanently deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mosa Dawas (talk • contribs) 20:35, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

user talk:65.246.108.97

I made a mistake while notifying user talk:65.246.108.97, so I blanked the section. Epicgenius (talk) 19:21, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Mid-America Council Districts

Recently got a notice that my edits to the Mid-America Council page did not conform to Wikipedia policies. The only edit that did not get accepted was the correction of the council's districts. My guess is that the district known as Diamond Dick did not meet the policies. However, this is the actual name of the district and can be confirmed by following the citation link. Please advise what you would like me to do to fix this situation.

Tom.barnett83 (talk) 20:05, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the Welcome

I appreciate your welcome. I have been a IP editor for 10 years or so but have no desire to join the club. There are many of us who choose not to get involved in all the politics and such. I do enjoy contributing and at times trying to improve an articles accuracy and tone. I disdain those who cannot separate their personal views from professional editing. That is one of the biggest problems with Wiki editors whether they be an IP or an "registered" editor. To much agenda pushing and not enough neutral POV. My IP changes all the time as do many other editors. My third one in 2 days. LOL Over the years I have been able to figure out the neutral admins from the agenda pushers and those sympathetic to agenda pushers. Like I said before the politics are a big turn off and I am truly an independent editor by not being one of the "club." Thanks again for the welcome. Here is my IP right now. It is one of thousands. 172.56.12.77 (talk) 20:18, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Your speedy nomination

of a village is wholly inappropriate and I consider it vandalism; such behavior will stop of someone here will stop it. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:27, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Le Courrier français (1820–1851)

I saw you tagged this article as unreferenced. In fact the article is fully sourced from Hatin, Eugène (1866). Bibliographie historique et critique de la presse périodique française. Firmin-Didot frères, fils et cie. {{cite book}}: Invalid |ref=harv (help), which is cited for each paragraph. Am I misunderstanding something? Aymatth2 (talk) 20:31, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

  Previously, it was unsourced.Rivalnator (talk) 19:50, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

• Nope. See the history, it was fully sourced from the first version. Why did you tag it? Aymatth2 (talk) 20:46, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

caroline klebl an orphan article

You tagged my article as an orphan article but its currently linked to several other articles such as: K. Pattabhi Jois, Asanas, alternative medicine, etc. as well as several catagories.

Nerdypunkkid (talk) 20:08, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Your speedy nomination

Dear Rivalnator, if you find articles lacking sufficient detail to show that it is noteworthy, could you also consider adding this information rather than nominating it for speedy deletion? I believe that those articles which have the potential to be included, should not be deleted without discussion. Inwind (talk) 07:21, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Question re "World Skateboarding Grand Prix" orphan tag

Hi Rivalnator, I did some additional clean-up work on my World Skateboarding Grand Prix article, basically removing a lot of internal links that were either repetitive or pretty obvious as to their meaning. I think it's a much cleaner article! I also looked into the "orphan" status and couldn't find good locations on Wikipedia to reference the article. However, I did find this page, which seems to be a summary of skateboarding organizations and competitions: "Category:Skateboarding competitions." Do you know if the World Skateboarding Grand Prix and/or competitions that it sponsors, including the Kimberley Diamond Cup, the biggest intl skateboarding event, can be listed? And might that help the orphan issue? Thanks in advance! Lawee — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yellowfin2014 (talk • contribs) 21:55, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Tom Lester

What specific changes did you undo? Mostly I put facts in chronological order. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.151.174.67 (talk) 04:28, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

2014 Algarve Cup squads

Contested, as your reason is pretty suspect... The other squads will be added later on when announced. Kante4 (talk) 20:10, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

N.C. Capital Tonight

Sorry, but your speedy doesn't apply (unless you know that the creator was blocked at a different account). The blocked user category only applies to creations made after the user is blocked, and this therefore cannot apply to creations by their original account. It only applies to socking or IP editing that's conclusively identifiable, or editing by meatpuppets on the blocked editor's behalf. (You wouldn't be the first to think it was a retrospective sanction, if that was the case...) Peridon (talk) 10:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

PS I've prodded it. Peridon (talk) 10:29, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Certainly listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Certainly. Since you had some involvement with the Certainly redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 15:49, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Rivalnator. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)